Hospital

TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 050351 · TORRANCE, CA 90509 · LOS ANGELES County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
3330 LOMITA BLVD, TORRANCE, CA 90509
Phone
(310) 325-9110
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit (Other)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
4 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
2
6
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
2
8
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 180 discharges
1.0503 p78
Heart Failure 819 discharges
1.0371 p72
Pneumonia 635 discharges
1.0844 p88
COPD 146 discharges
1.0226 p70
Hip/Knee Replacement 764 discharges
0.7376 p2
CABG Surgery
1.0816 p81
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

47.0 p90
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
17.9 p98
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
9.6 p45
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
12.0 p71
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
7.5 p67
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0844
Value-Based Purchasing
47.0 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.4744

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 1.60 Better Than the National Rate 749
Hybrid_HWM 3.40 Better Than the National Rate 2,824
MORT_30_AMI 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate 174
MORT_30_CABG 1.90 No Different Than the National Rate 38
MORT_30_COPD 8.50 No Different Than the National Rate 127
MORT_30_HF 9.30 Better Than the National Rate 708
MORT_30_PN 13.10 Better Than the National Rate 652
MORT_30_STK 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate 327
PSI_03 1.21 Worse Than the National Rate 9,154
PSI_04 171.72 No Different Than the National Rate 121
PSI_06 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 11,109
PSI_08 0.21 No Different Than the National Rate 11,330
PSI_09 2.66 No Different Than the National Rate 2,802
PSI_10 1.64 No Different Than the National Rate 1,513
PSI_11 15.79 Worse Than the National Rate 1,494
PSI_12 4.13 No Different Than the National Rate 2,964
PSI_13 5.24 No Different Than the National Rate 1,479
PSI_14 1.55 No Different Than the National Rate 650
PSI_15 0.85 No Different Than the National Rate 2,154
PSI_90 1.36 Worse Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 79% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 17% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 77% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 18% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 74% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 21% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 78% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 84% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 76% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 18% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 20% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 61% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 21% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 76% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 9% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 45% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 32% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 23% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 14% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 86% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 17% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 83% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 11% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 89% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 76% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 8% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 16% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 52% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 13% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 35% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 5% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 16% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 79% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 82% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 15% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.145 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.874 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 13584.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 12.678 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 5.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.394 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.532 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.866 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 9140.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 9.553 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 1.047 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.043 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.854 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 314.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 7.741 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 2.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.258 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.032 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 3.149 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 196.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.566 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.639 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.007 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.731 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 138510.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 6.749 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.148 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.244 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.501 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 130037.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 84.471 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 30.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.355 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 98.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 180.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 178.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c — Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 96.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 28.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 16.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 74.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 74.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 77.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 83.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 96.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 19.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 17.90 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 30.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 3.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 17.30 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.94

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.13 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.71 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 6.58 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $813,445,137 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $50,846,936 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $846,476,431 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -4.7% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,345,465,289 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $797,626,223 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $532,020,152 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 5.4% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 0.8% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 3330 LOMITA BLVD — Address
General Information City/Town TORRANCE — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 2 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 5 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 2 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish LOS ANGELES — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 050351 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Other — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State CA — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (310) 325-9110 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 90509 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 1.31 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.38 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.44 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.48 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.46 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.47 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.94 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 0.9995 p78 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 180 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 29 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.7% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.08 1.0000 p81 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 12.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 13.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9969 p70 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.3% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 146 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 29 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9983 p72 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 18.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 819 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 163 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 19.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.74 0.9916 p2 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 4.9% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 764 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 24 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 3.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.08 0.9955 p88 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 635 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 110 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 17.92 5.00 p98 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 7.50 2.50 p67 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 12.00 8.75 p71 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 9.58 10.00 p45 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 47.00 29.50 p90 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →