Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
15TH STREET AT CALIFORNIA, CHICAGO, IL 60608
Phone
(773) 542-2000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
1 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 6 of 7 measures reported
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 6 of 8 measures reported
1
4
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 7 of 11 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 8 of 12 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack)
0.9760 p34
Heart Failure 104 discharges
0.9868 p41
Pneumonia
1.0193 p64
COPD 36 discharges
1.0437 p82
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

14.6 p4
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
6.3 p58
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
3.3 p5
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
5.0 p19
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0437
Value-Based Purchasing
14.6 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 1.4893

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
Hybrid_HWM 4.40 No Different Than the National Rate 216
MORT_30_AMI 12.10 No Different Than the National Rate 33
MORT_30_CABG Number of Cases Too Small
MORT_30_COPD 9.20 No Different Than the National Rate 30
MORT_30_HF 9.90 No Different Than the National Rate 75
MORT_30_PN 15.30 No Different Than the National Rate 49
MORT_30_STK 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate 32
PSI_03 0.95 No Different Than the National Rate 1,177
PSI_04 200.69 No Different Than the National Rate 31
PSI_06 0.19 No Different Than the National Rate 1,295
PSI_08 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate 1,333
PSI_09 2.13 No Different Than the National Rate 296
PSI_10 2.06 No Different Than the National Rate 53
PSI_11 13.88 No Different Than the National Rate 59
PSI_12 3.87 No Different Than the National Rate 291
PSI_13 4.49 No Different Than the National Rate 58
PSI_14 1.71 No Different Than the National Rate 80
PSI_15 0.97 No Different Than the National Rate 261
PSI_90 1.20 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 69%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 11%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 20%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 1
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 73%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 9%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 18%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 68%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 12%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 20%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 66%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 12%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 22%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 74%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 8%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 73%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 19%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 69%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 9%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 22%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 53%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 31%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 16%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 66%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 17%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 17%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 39%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 44%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 17%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 22%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 78%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 1
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 22%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 78%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 21%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 79%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 57%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 21%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 22%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 1
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 48%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 24%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 28%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 18%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 27%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 55%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 15%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 48%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 37%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 1

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 1.828 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 4.158 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 8052.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 8.168 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 23.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 2.816 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.679 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 2.129 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 7322.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 9.582 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 12.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 1.252 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.597 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 2.702 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 143.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 5.124 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 7.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.366 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.030 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.944 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 189.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.675 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.597 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.380 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.300 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 60708.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 4.819 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.038 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.314 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.819 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 56868.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 32.567 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 17.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.522 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 11.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 2.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 98.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 213.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 200.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 340.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 73.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 98.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 6.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 51.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 56.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 81.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 74.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 95.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 84.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 93.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI Number of Cases Too Small
EDAC_30_HF 40.50 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 0.60 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 12.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 Number of cases too small
READM_30_AMI 13.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_COPD 19.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 16.30 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.99

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 84 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.22 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 0.35 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 5.25 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $15,125,000 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-20,940,590 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $346,253,562 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -35.7% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $306,366,000 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $307,637,127 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $291,241,000 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -4.7% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 5.5% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 15TH STREET AT CALIFORNIA Address
General Information City/Town CHICAGO City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 6 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 7 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 6 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 8 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish COOK County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 140018 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State IL State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (773) 542-2000 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 60608 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.93 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.78 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.78 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 2.05 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.13 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 1.49 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.99 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9995 p34 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 16.6% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 16.2% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9969 p82 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 20.6% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 36 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 11 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 21.5% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9983 p41 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 23.4% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 104 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 23 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 23.1% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9955 p64 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.7% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.1% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 6.25 5.00 p58 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 5.00 8.75 p19 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 3.33 10.00 p5 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 14.58 29.50 p4 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →