Hospital

MAYO CLINIC HOSPITAL

CCN: 030103 · PHOENIX, AZ 85054 · MARICOPA County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
5777 EAST MAYO BOULEVARD, PHOENIX, AZ 85054
Phone
(480) 342-4201
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
4
3
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
2
9
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 253 discharges
1.0191 p62
Heart Failure 986 discharges
0.9190 p8
Pneumonia 1,085 discharges
0.9254 p10
COPD 145 discharges
0.9170 p2
Hip/Knee Replacement 157 discharges
1.1520 p84
CABG Surgery 91 discharges
1.0827 p82
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

53.0 p95
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
18.8 p98
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
2.5 p3
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
24.3 p98
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
7.5 p67
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1520
Value-Based Purchasing
53.0 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.0274

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.60 No Different Than the National Rate 168
Hybrid_HWM 2.60 Better Than the National Rate 4,339
MORT_30_AMI 9.50 No Different Than the National Rate 245
MORT_30_CABG 1.80 No Different Than the National Rate 92
MORT_30_COPD 6.40 No Different Than the National Rate 133
MORT_30_HF 9.10 Better Than the National Rate 857
MORT_30_PN 11.60 Better Than the National Rate 1,004
MORT_30_STK 9.40 Better Than the National Rate 312
PSI_03 0.21 Better Than the National Rate 16,145
PSI_04 115.44 Better Than the National Rate 306
PSI_06 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 17,299
PSI_08 0.19 No Different Than the National Rate 19,712
PSI_09 3.17 No Different Than the National Rate 5,145
PSI_10 2.24 No Different Than the National Rate 3,321
PSI_11 9.11 No Different Than the National Rate 3,094
PSI_12 4.12 No Different Than the National Rate 6,130
PSI_13 5.66 No Different Than the National Rate 3,309
PSI_14 1.85 No Different Than the National Rate 2,189
PSI_15 0.36 Better Than the National Rate 5,539
PSI_90 0.91 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 88% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 2% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 10% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 5
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 93% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 86% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 2% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 12% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 84% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 3% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 13% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 86% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 11% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 5
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 92% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 86% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 3% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 11% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 81% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 15% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 69% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 16% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 15% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 4
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 81% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 6% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 13% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 56% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 25% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 19% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 8% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 92% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 5
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 9% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 91% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 7% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 93% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 80% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 4% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 16% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 72% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 4% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 24% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 5
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 3% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 6% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 91% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 5
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 1% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 93% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 6% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 5

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.404 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.936 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 34425.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 35.008 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 22.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.628 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.396 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.033 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 21291.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 25.814 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 17.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.659 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.854 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 2.226 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 458.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 11.980 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 17.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.419 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.295 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 5.812 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 145.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.137 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.759 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.168 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.276 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 113539.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 7.560 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.529 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.351 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.634 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 113539.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 92.330 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 44.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.477 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 44.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 202.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 201.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c — Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 46.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 69.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 18.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 60.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 53.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 83.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 94.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 9.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -10.60 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -11.90 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.10 Better Than the National Rate
OP_32 15.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 9.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 6.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 16.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 14.80 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.94

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 98 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.30 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.47 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 22.31 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $2,116,600,454 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $268,054,207 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $2,583,603,436 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 4.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $3,133,467,475 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,116,014,359 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $1,016,867,021 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 9.8% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.2% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 5777 EAST MAYO BOULEVARD — Address
General Information City/Town PHOENIX — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 4 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 3 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 2 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MARICOPA — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 030103 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MAYO CLINIC HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State AZ — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (480) 342-4201 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 85054 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.48 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.51 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.75 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.45 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.94 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.03 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.94 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9995 p62 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 253 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 35 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.5% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.08 1.0000 p82 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 91 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 12 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.9% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9969 p2 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.1% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 145 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 19 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 17.5% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9983 p8 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.5% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 986 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 180 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.15 0.9916 p84 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.7% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 157 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 12 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 0.9955 p10 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 1,085 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 163 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 18.75 5.00 p98 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 7.50 2.50 p67 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 24.25 8.75 p98 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 2.50 10.00 p3 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 53.00 29.50 p95 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →