Hospital

UT OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS JR.

CCN: 450044 · DALLAS, TX 75390 · DALLAS County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
6201 HARRY HINES BLVD, DALLAS, TX 75390
Phone
(214) 633-5555
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Government (State)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
4 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
3
4
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
9
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 139 discharges
1.1005 p93
Heart Failure 663 discharges
0.9909 p44
Pneumonia 567 discharges
1.0535 p80
COPD 136 discharges
1.0604 p90
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.9371 p34
CABG Surgery
1.0959 p85
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

44.8 p88
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
20.0 p99
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
6.3 p19
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
18.5 p93
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1005
Value-Based Purchasing
44.8 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.1590

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.20 No Different Than the National Rate 60
Hybrid_HWM 3.10 Better Than the National Rate 2,924
MORT_30_AMI 11.00 No Different Than the National Rate 129
MORT_30_CABG 1.90 No Different Than the National Rate 63
MORT_30_COPD 6.10 No Different Than the National Rate 122
MORT_30_HF 8.20 Better Than the National Rate 544
MORT_30_PN 10.30 Better Than the National Rate 540
MORT_30_STK 11.90 No Different Than the National Rate 263
PSI_03 0.89 No Different Than the National Rate 13,807
PSI_04 136.98 Better Than the National Rate 314
PSI_06 0.24 No Different Than the National Rate 14,917
PSI_08 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 16,518
PSI_09 3.50 Worse Than the National Rate 4,552
PSI_10 1.26 No Different Than the National Rate 3,181
PSI_11 8.48 No Different Than the National Rate 3,127
PSI_12 4.34 No Different Than the National Rate 5,033
PSI_13 6.11 No Different Than the National Rate 3,175
PSI_14 1.71 No Different Than the National Rate 1,481
PSI_15 1.33 No Different Than the National Rate 4,279
PSI_90 1.13 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 81% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 76% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 83% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 13% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 89% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 82% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 13% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 78% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 17% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 64% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 78% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 7% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 49% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 30% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 10% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 90% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 11% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 89% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 9% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 91% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 71% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 9% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 20% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 76% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 4% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 20% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 5
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 5% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 12% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 83% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 5
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 85% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 12% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.405 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.840 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 46122.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 48.918 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 29.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.593 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.329 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.778 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 27674.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 40.582 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 21.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.517 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.332 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.250 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 464.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 13.217 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 9.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.681 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.545 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 3.297 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 396.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 3.361 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.488 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.309 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.971 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 228625.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 21.008 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 12.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.571 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.196 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.394 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 221331.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 113.364 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 32.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.282 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 85.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 331.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 330.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c — Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 90.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 23.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 37.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 47.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 47.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 69.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 85.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 94.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 57.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 7.10 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 17.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.90 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 15.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 19.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.80 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.98

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 94 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.28 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 3.88 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 11.12 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,079,239,626 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $82,546,249 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $2,611,149,600 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -2.4% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $2,204,686,778 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $2,172,866,042 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $1,125,447,152 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 3.0% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 3.4% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 6201 HARRY HINES BLVD — Address
General Information City/Town DALLAS — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 3 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish DALLAS — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 450044 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name UT OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS JR. — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Government - State — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State TX — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (214) 633-5555 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 75390 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.49 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.32 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.67 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.42 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.26 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.16 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.98 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.10 0.9995 p93 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 16.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 139 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 30 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 17.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.10 1.0000 p85 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.3% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 12.4% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9969 p90 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 17.1% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 136 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 29 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.1% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9983 p44 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 21.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 663 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 141 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.4% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9916 p34 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 7.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.5% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 0.9955 p80 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 18.1% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 567 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 112 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 19.1% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 20.00 5.00 p99 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 18.50 8.75 p93 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 6.25 10.00 p19 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 44.75 29.50 p88 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →