Hospital

UNIVERSITY OF WI HOSPITALS & CLINICS AUTHORITY

CCN: 520098 · MADISON, WI 53792 · DANE County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
600 HIGHLAND AVENUE, MADISON, WI 53792
Phone
(608) 263-6400
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Government (District)
Emergency Services
Yes
4 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
1
10
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 398 discharges
0.9906 p44
Heart Failure 662 discharges
1.0741 p86
Pneumonia 512 discharges
0.9951 p49
COPD 118 discharges
0.9798 p34
Hip/Knee Replacement 288 discharges
0.8953 p23
CABG Surgery 160 discharges
0.9396 p26
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

39.3 p78
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
14.2 p93
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
3.3 p5
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
14.3 p81
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
7.5 p67
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0741
Value-Based Purchasing
39.3 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.3436

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.00 No Different Than the National Rate 287
Hybrid_HWM 3.00 Better Than the National Rate 3,474
MORT_30_AMI 11.20 No Different Than the National Rate 352
MORT_30_CABG 3.10 No Different Than the National Rate 164
MORT_30_COPD 7.50 No Different Than the National Rate 104
MORT_30_HF 7.50 Better Than the National Rate 565
MORT_30_PN 10.00 Better Than the National Rate 504
MORT_30_STK 14.30 No Different Than the National Rate 395
PSI_03 0.71 No Different Than the National Rate 13,588
PSI_04 181.11 No Different Than the National Rate 341
PSI_06 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 14,967
PSI_08 0.23 No Different Than the National Rate 16,098
PSI_09 2.56 No Different Than the National Rate 4,743
PSI_10 1.80 No Different Than the National Rate 3,095
PSI_11 9.25 No Different Than the National Rate 2,990
PSI_12 4.93 Worse Than the National Rate 5,729
PSI_13 3.89 No Different Than the National Rate 3,097
PSI_14 2.00 No Different Than the National Rate 1,690
PSI_15 1.41 No Different Than the National Rate 4,035
PSI_90 1.04 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 82% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 2% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 16% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 89% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 3% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 18% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 3% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 80% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 16% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 87% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 22% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 61% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 21% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 74% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 8% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 49% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 27% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 24% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 9% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 91% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 10% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 90% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 9% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 91% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 69% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 8% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 23% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 59% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 9% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 32% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 6% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 17% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 77% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 2% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 81% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 17% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.267 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.717 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 31585.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 35.457 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 16.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.451 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.489 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.133 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 19310.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 28.928 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 22.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.761 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.680 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.773 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 586.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 15.041 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 17.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.130 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.296 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 3.162 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 325.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.582 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.162 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.342 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.199 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 215741.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 14.868 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.673 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.554 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.812 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 209374.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 155.840 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 105.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.674 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 94.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 224.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 217.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 378.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 487.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 74.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 96.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 16.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 57.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 65.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 97.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 90.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 5.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 7.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 16.10 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 9.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 6.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.10 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.93

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 98 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.23 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.02 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 14.89 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $2,750,280,929 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $303,287,650 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $3,028,814,068 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 4.5% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $5,550,368,791 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,894,788,310 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $2,800,087,862 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 9.4% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.3% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 600 HIGHLAND AVENUE — Address
General Information City/Town MADISON — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 2 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 5 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 10 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish DANE — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 520098 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name UNIVERSITY OF WI HOSPITALS & CLINICS AUTHORITY — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Government - Hospital District or Authority — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State WI — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (608) 263-6400 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 53792 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.70 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.70 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.58 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.47 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.23 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.34 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.93 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9995 p44 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.3% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 398 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 48 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 12.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 1.0000 p26 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 9.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 160 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 12 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 8.5% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9969 p34 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 17.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 118 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 19 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 17.4% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 0.9983 p86 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.5% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 662 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 144 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 0.9916 p23 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.1% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 288 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 12 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9955 p49 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 512 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 77 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.1% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 14.17 5.00 p93 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 7.50 2.50 p67 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 14.25 8.75 p81 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 3.33 10.00 p5 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 39.25 29.50 p78 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →