Hospital

GRANT MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 360017 · COLUMBUS, OH 43215 · FRANKLIN County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
111 SOUTH GRANT AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43215
Phone
(614) 566-9164
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit (Church)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
1
6
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
10
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 123 discharges
0.9867 p40
Heart Failure 322 discharges
1.0624 p83
Pneumonia 285 discharges
1.0411 p76
COPD 66 discharges
0.9858 p39
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.9952 p50
CABG Surgery
0.9984 p48
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

21.4 p21
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
6.7 p62
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
5.0 p12
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
7.3 p37
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
2.5 p43
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0624
Value-Based Purchasing
21.4 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.7872

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.60 No Different Than the National Rate 41
Hybrid_HWM 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate 1,514
MORT_30_AMI 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate 127
MORT_30_CABG 2.60 No Different Than the National Rate 41
MORT_30_COPD 8.50 No Different Than the National Rate 55
MORT_30_HF 9.60 No Different Than the National Rate 267
MORT_30_PN 16.60 No Different Than the National Rate 252
MORT_30_STK 14.20 No Different Than the National Rate 80
PSI_03 1.33 Worse Than the National Rate 5,250
PSI_04 202.44 No Different Than the National Rate 133
PSI_06 0.15 No Different Than the National Rate 5,833
PSI_08 0.25 No Different Than the National Rate 5,708
PSI_09 1.68 No Different Than the National Rate 1,896
PSI_10 3.13 No Different Than the National Rate 823
PSI_11 6.26 No Different Than the National Rate 724
PSI_12 2.79 No Different Than the National Rate 2,068
PSI_13 5.58 No Different Than the National Rate 805
PSI_14 1.52 No Different Than the National Rate 382
PSI_15 0.98 No Different Than the National Rate 1,282
PSI_90 1.13 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 74% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 20% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 73% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 21% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 69% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 77% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 75% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 18% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 21% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 57% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 24% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 71% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 11% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 44% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 38% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 18% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 14% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 86% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 15% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 85% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 14% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 86% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 69% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 9% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 22% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 59% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 10% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 31% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 10% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 18% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 72% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 6% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 71% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 23% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.462 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.526 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 14104.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 12.530 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 11.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.878 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.023 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.448 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 16295.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 14.738 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 2.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.136 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.514 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.805 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 316.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 9.874 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.013 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.023 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.310 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 228.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.135 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.468 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 1.164 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.879 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 154679.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 10.116 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 19.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.878 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.436 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.734 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 148506.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 99.878 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 57.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.571 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 83.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 160.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 154.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 243.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 220.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 58.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 96.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 44.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 12.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 43.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 70.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 61.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 84.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 91.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 9.30 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 35.00 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 30.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.60 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.97

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 94 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.20 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.96 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.99 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $62,504,809 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $165,522,114 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,255,983,937 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 11.7% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $527,056,124 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $891,261,125 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $464,551,315 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 13.0% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 7.3% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 111 SOUTH GRANT AVENUE — Address
General Information City/Town COLUMBUS — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 7 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 10 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish FRANKLIN — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 360017 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name GRANT MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Church — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State OH — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (614) 566-9164 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 43215 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.52 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.55 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.99 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 2.07 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.85 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.79 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.97 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9995 p40 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.1% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 123 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 14 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 11.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 1.0000 p48 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9969 p39 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.5% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 66 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 11 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.3% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9983 p83 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 322 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 75 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9916 p50 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9955 p76 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.9% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 285 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 53 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.6% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 6.67 5.00 p62 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 2.50 2.50 p43 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 7.25 8.75 p37 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 5.00 10.00 p12 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 21.42 29.50 p21 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →