Hospital

STANFORD HEALTH CARE

CCN: 050441 · STANFORD, CA 94305 · SANTA CLARA County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
300 PASTEUR DRIVE, STANFORD, CA 94305
Phone
(650) 723-5708
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
3
4
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
1
7
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
2
7
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 270 discharges
0.9377 p15
Heart Failure 877 discharges
1.0439 p75
Pneumonia 829 discharges
1.0341 p72
COPD 133 discharges
0.9751 p29
Hip/Knee Replacement 544 discharges
0.6731 p1
CABG Surgery 201 discharges
0.8532 p5
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

38.0 p75
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
16.7 p96
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
3.3 p5
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
18.0 p92
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0439
Value-Based Purchasing
38.0 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.0796

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.20 No Different Than the National Rate 550
Hybrid_HWM 2.50 Better Than the National Rate 4,988
MORT_30_AMI 9.40 Better Than the National Rate 258
MORT_30_CABG 1.20 Better Than the National Rate 204
MORT_30_COPD 7.90 No Different Than the National Rate 120
MORT_30_HF 5.90 Better Than the National Rate 764
MORT_30_PN 10.50 Better Than the National Rate 789
MORT_30_STK 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate 394
PSI_03 0.52 No Different Than the National Rate 19,915
PSI_04 166.09 No Different Than the National Rate 470
PSI_06 0.13 No Different Than the National Rate 20,799
PSI_08 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 23,182
PSI_09 2.36 No Different Than the National Rate 7,846
PSI_10 0.94 No Different Than the National Rate 5,694
PSI_11 4.08 Better Than the National Rate 5,296
PSI_12 5.31 Worse Than the National Rate 8,661
PSI_13 5.20 No Different Than the National Rate 5,603
PSI_14 1.38 No Different Than the National Rate 2,211
PSI_15 1.06 No Different Than the National Rate 5,374
PSI_90 0.86 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 83% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 90% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 81% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 3% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 16% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 78% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 18% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 82% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 89% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 81% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 15% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 78% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 17% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 65% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 16% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 4
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 78% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 7% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 51% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 25% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 24% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 10% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 90% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 10% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 90% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 10% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 90% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 77% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 6% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 17% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 56% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 15% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 29% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 6% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 13% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 81% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 84% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 13% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.601 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.037 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 62665.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 65.260 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 52.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.797 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.366 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.833 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 31289.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 40.789 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 23.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.564 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.431 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.241 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 666.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 18.472 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 14.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.758 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.018 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 1.801 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 317.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.738 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.365 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.358 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.182 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 239537.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 16.178 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 11.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.680 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.334 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.563 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 239537.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 130.302 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 57.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.437 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 87.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 278.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 277.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 391.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 437.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 69.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 88.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 16.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 54.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 52.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 86.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 79.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 91.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 24.50 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 23.10 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 22.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 14.10 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.70 Better than expected
READM_30_AMI 12.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 3.30 Better Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.98

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 98 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.14 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.18 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 22.81 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $8,101,249,536 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $1,054,860,529 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $7,893,382,434 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 5.9% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $12,742,655,687 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $5,200,387,617 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $4,641,406,151 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 12.5% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 0.5% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 300 PASTEUR DRIVE — Address
General Information City/Town STANFORD — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 3 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 2 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 7 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish SANTA CLARA — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 050441 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name STANFORD HEALTH CARE — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State CA — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (650) 723-5708 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 94305 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.69 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.48 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.70 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.76 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.99 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.08 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.98 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9995 p15 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.3% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 270 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 33 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.4% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.85 1.0000 p5 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 12.9% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 201 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 18 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 11.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9969 p29 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.2% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 133 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 23 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9983 p75 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 877 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 185 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.7% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.67 0.9916 p1 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 544 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 16 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 3.8% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9955 p72 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 829 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 144 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.1% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 16.67 5.00 p96 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 18.00 8.75 p92 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 3.33 10.00 p5 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 38.00 29.50 p75 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →