Hospital

DUKE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

CCN: 340030 · DURHAM, NC 27705 · DURHAM County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
2301 ERWIN RD, DURHAM, NC 27705
Phone
(919) 684-8111
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
2
4
1
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
2
5
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
2
9
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 409 discharges
0.8818 p3
Heart Failure 887 discharges
0.8466 p0
Pneumonia 453 discharges
0.9024 p5
COPD 172 discharges
1.0097 p61
Hip/Knee Replacement 262 discharges
0.9282 p31
CABG Surgery 275 discharges
0.9034 p15
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

44.4 p87
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
16.3 p96
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
6.7 p21
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
16.5 p89
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
5.0 p56
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0097
Value-Based Purchasing
44.4 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.3547

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.70 No Different Than the National Rate 274
Hybrid_HWM 3.10 Better Than the National Rate 3,504
MORT_30_AMI 9.80 Better Than the National Rate 329
MORT_30_CABG 1.80 No Different Than the National Rate 282
MORT_30_COPD 7.70 No Different Than the National Rate 153
MORT_30_HF 9.20 Better Than the National Rate 742
MORT_30_PN 12.00 Better Than the National Rate 433
MORT_30_STK 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate 376
PSI_03 0.50 No Different Than the National Rate 14,819
PSI_04 216.01 Worse Than the National Rate 366
PSI_06 0.16 No Different Than the National Rate 15,279
PSI_08 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 16,992
PSI_09 2.62 No Different Than the National Rate 5,880
PSI_10 2.95 Worse Than the National Rate 3,680
PSI_11 8.88 No Different Than the National Rate 3,482
PSI_12 5.50 Worse Than the National Rate 6,581
PSI_13 5.96 No Different Than the National Rate 3,644
PSI_14 2.49 No Different Than the National Rate 1,495
PSI_15 0.91 No Different Than the National Rate 4,083
PSI_90 1.10 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 82% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 80% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 3% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 83% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 90% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 82% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 14% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 64% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 16% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 20% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 79% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 7% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 14% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 49% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 26% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 25% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 10% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 90% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 11% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 89% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 8% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 92% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 67% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 11% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 22% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 61% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 8% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 31% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 5% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 15% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 80% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 82% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 15% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.630 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.004 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 79007.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 88.653 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 71.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.801 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.350 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.710 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 38628.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 61.234 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 31.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.506 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.759 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.794 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 614.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 17.593 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 21.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.194 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.477 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 3.618 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 283.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.667 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.500 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.340 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.789 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 392560.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 41.542 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 22.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.530 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.294 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.464 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 361501.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 199.222 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 74.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.371 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 96.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 305.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 300.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 641.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 5.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 82.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 98.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 52.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 57.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 95.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 75.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 90.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 2.30 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -23.80 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -7.30 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 8.60 Better Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 12.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 16.60 Better Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.95

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 97 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.95 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 9.57 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,902,402,689 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $349,336,553 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $4,026,979,063 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 7.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $2,405,003,578 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $2,710,950,718 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $502,600,889 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 8.5% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.1% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 2301 ERWIN RD — Address
General Information City/Town DURHAM — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 2 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 1 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 2 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish DURHAM — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 340030 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name DUKE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NC — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (919) 684-8111 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 27705 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.56 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.39 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.90 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.69 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.19 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.35 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.95 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.88 0.9995 p3 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.5% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 409 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 46 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 12.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 1.0000 p15 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 275 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 25 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9969 p61 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.0% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 172 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 32 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.2% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.85 0.9983 p0 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 887 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 145 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 17.7% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 0.9916 p31 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.1% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 262 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 14 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.7% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 0.9955 p5 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.6% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 453 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 65 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.9% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 16.25 5.00 p96 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 5.00 2.50 p56 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 16.50 8.75 p89 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 6.67 10.00 p21 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 44.42 29.50 p87 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →