Hospital

NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL

CCN: 330101 · NEW YORK, NY 10065 · NEW YORK County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
525 EAST 68TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10065
Phone
(212) 746-5454
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
5
2
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
3
6
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

✓ This hospital does not have excess readmissions triggering HRRP penalties.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 703 discharges
0.9657 p27
Heart Failure 2,781 discharges
0.8620 p1
Pneumonia 2,645 discharges
0.9382 p14
COPD 631 discharges
0.9423 p7
Hip/Knee Replacement 725 discharges
0.7871 p6
CABG Surgery 380 discharges
0.9350 p23
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

39.0 p77
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
20.8 p99
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
4.2 p9
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
9.0 p51
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
5.0 p56
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Not Penalized
Worst ERR: 0.9657
Value-Based Purchasing
39.0 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.0825

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.20 No Different Than the National Rate 670
Hybrid_HWM 2.20 Better Than the National Rate 11,804
MORT_30_AMI 9.90 Better Than the National Rate 613
MORT_30_CABG 1.80 No Different Than the National Rate 389
MORT_30_COPD 5.90 Better Than the National Rate 541
MORT_30_HF 7.10 Better Than the National Rate 2,412
MORT_30_PN 11.60 Better Than the National Rate 2,617
MORT_30_STK 10.30 Better Than the National Rate 930
PSI_03 0.09 Better Than the National Rate 44,511
PSI_04 156.83 No Different Than the National Rate 798
PSI_06 0.11 No Different Than the National Rate 48,588
PSI_08 0.14 Better Than the National Rate 52,654
PSI_09 0.94 Better Than the National Rate 12,529
PSI_10 0.48 Better Than the National Rate 8,078
PSI_11 6.15 Better Than the National Rate 8,277
PSI_12 1.48 Better Than the National Rate 14,926
PSI_13 1.66 Better Than the National Rate 8,436
PSI_14 0.84 No Different Than the National Rate 3,187
PSI_15 0.35 Better Than the National Rate 10,364
PSI_90 0.40 Better Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 76% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 73% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 21% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 21% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 79% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 78% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 15% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 74% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 59% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 22% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 73% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 11% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 16% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 46% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 34% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 20% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 13% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 87% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 15% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 85% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 12% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 88% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 67% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 10% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 23% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 51% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 18% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 31% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 9% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 21% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 70% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 6% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 73% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 21% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.565 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.844 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 120899.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 138.356 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 96.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.694 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.450 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.757 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 68424.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 96.858 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 57.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.588 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.550 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.300 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 944.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 24.271 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 21.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.865 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.008 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 0.783 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 761.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 6.298 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.159 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.624 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.076 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 889576.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 62.894 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 52.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.827 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.181 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.274 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 804904.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 393.325 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 88.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.224 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 95.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 236.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 230.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 417.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 96.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 12.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 40.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 54.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 76.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 76.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 64.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 7.50 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -3.80 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 15.00 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 13.60 Better Than the National Rate
OP_32 10.60 Better Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 15.20 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 3.60 Better Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.60 Better than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 17.10 Better Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 15.00 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.99

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 97 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.65 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 11.86 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $9,279,309,000 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $1,202,576,000 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $9,309,983,652 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -5.5% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $20,037,676,000 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $7,921,779,632 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $7,920,814,000 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 11.8% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.4% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 525 EAST 68TH STREET — Address
General Information City/Town NEW YORK — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 5 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 2 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 3 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 6 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish NEW YORK — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 330101 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NY — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (212) 746-5454 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 10065 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.69 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.29 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.91 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.85 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.82 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.08 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.99 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9995 p27 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 15.3% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 703 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 102 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 1.0000 p23 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.8% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 380 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 40 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 11.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9969 p7 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.9% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 631 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 114 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.8% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.86 0.9983 p1 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 2,781 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 491 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.79 0.9916 p6 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.2% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 725 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 27 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.1% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9955 p14 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.0% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 2,645 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 418 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.0% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 20.83 5.00 p99 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 5.00 2.50 p56 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 9.00 8.75 p51 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 4.17 10.00 p9 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 39.00 29.50 p77 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →