Hospital

HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 310001 · HACKENSACK, NJ 07601 · BERGEN County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
30 PROSPECT AVE, HACKENSACK, NJ 07601
Phone
(551) 996-2000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
5
2
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
4
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
2
6
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 435 discharges
0.9613 p25
Heart Failure 1,119 discharges
0.9179 p8
Pneumonia 1,119 discharges
1.0375 p74
COPD 249 discharges
0.9359 p5
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.8610 p15
CABG Surgery 245 discharges
0.8412 p4
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

36.3 p72
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
20.4 p99
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
7.9 p32
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
8.0 p43
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0375
Value-Based Purchasing
36.3 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.2762

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.20 No Different Than the National Rate 116
Hybrid_HWM 3.20 Better Than the National Rate 3,697
MORT_30_AMI 9.80 Better Than the National Rate 355
MORT_30_CABG 1.60 No Different Than the National Rate 248
MORT_30_COPD 6.30 Better Than the National Rate 223
MORT_30_HF 8.10 Better Than the National Rate 990
MORT_30_PN 10.10 Better Than the National Rate 1,089
MORT_30_STK 10.40 Better Than the National Rate 482
PSI_03 0.58 No Different Than the National Rate 15,623
PSI_04 163.25 No Different Than the National Rate 238
PSI_06 0.16 No Different Than the National Rate 15,346
PSI_08 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 16,531
PSI_09 1.65 No Different Than the National Rate 3,764
PSI_10 1.44 No Different Than the National Rate 1,630
PSI_11 4.88 Better Than the National Rate 1,627
PSI_12 2.13 No Different Than the National Rate 4,288
PSI_13 4.25 No Different Than the National Rate 1,599
PSI_14 1.28 No Different Than the National Rate 1,101
PSI_15 0.88 No Different Than the National Rate 3,345
PSI_90 0.72 Better Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 76% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 73% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 21% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 72% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 77% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 84% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 76% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 72% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 21% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 57% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 23% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 20% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 73% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 11% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 16% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 42% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 36% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 22% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 15% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 85% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 16% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 84% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 13% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 87% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 69% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 9% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 22% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 51% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 16% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 33% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 9% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 19% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 72% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 6% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 74% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 20% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.110 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.563 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 19656.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 22.159 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 6.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.271 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.285 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.819 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 19616.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 28.008 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 14.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.500 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.526 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.576 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 522.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 13.750 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 13.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.945 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.358 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.716 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 441.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 3.553 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.126 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.493 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.285 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 267555.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 20.748 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 17.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.819 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.307 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.529 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 242527.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 127.928 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 52.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.406 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 97.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 194.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 189.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 220.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 93.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 17.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 73.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 77.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 87.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 80.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 91.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 14.10 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 17.50 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 30.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 14.30 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 3.60 Better Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.70 Better than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 8.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.60 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.09

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.24 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 5.16 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 8.59 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,740,575,207 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $85,984,946 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $2,417,984,255 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -3.0% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,855,556,659 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,913,178,414 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $114,981,452 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 3.3% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.8% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 30 PROSPECT AVE — Address
General Information City/Town HACKENSACK — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 5 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 2 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 2 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 6 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 4 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish BERGEN — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 310001 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NJ — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (551) 996-2000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 07601 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.42 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.45 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.50 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.65 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.95 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.28 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.09 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.96 0.9995 p25 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 15.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 435 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 64 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.84 1.0000 p4 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.4% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 245 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 19 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 9.6% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9969 p5 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 21.1% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 249 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 44 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9983 p8 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 21.8% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,119 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 218 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.86 0.9916 p15 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.3% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9955 p74 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 19.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 1,119 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 232 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 20.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 20.42 5.00 p99 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 8.00 8.75 p43 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 7.92 10.00 p32 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 36.33 29.50 p72 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →