Hospital

KANSAS HEART HOSPITAL

CCN: 170186 · WICHITA, KS 67226 · SEDGWICK County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
3601 NORTH WEBB ROAD, WICHITA, KS 67226
Phone
(316) 630-5000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
No
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 4 of 7 measures reported
4
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 3 of 8 measures reported
3
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 5 of 11 measures reported
5
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 4 of 12 measures reported
4 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

✓ This hospital does not have excess readmissions triggering HRRP penalties.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 296 discharges
0.9271 p11
Heart Failure 191 discharges
0.9035 p6
Pneumonia
— Not reported
COPD
— Not reported
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery 300 discharges
0.7693 p0
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

38.2 p75
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
8.3 p73
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
8.3 p35
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
21.5 p96
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Not Penalized
Worst ERR: 0.9271
Value-Based Purchasing
38.2 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.3418

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — — —
Hybrid_HWM 5.40 No Different Than the National Rate 499
MORT_30_AMI 13.00 No Different Than the National Rate 247
MORT_30_CABG 1.90 No Different Than the National Rate 302
MORT_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_HF 12.00 No Different Than the National Rate 152
MORT_30_PN — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_STK — — —
PSI_03 0.42 No Different Than the National Rate 916
PSI_04 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_06 0.18 No Different Than the National Rate 1,232
PSI_08 0.30 No Different Than the National Rate 1,620
PSI_09 2.34 No Different Than the National Rate 966
PSI_10 2.38 No Different Than the National Rate 687
PSI_11 15.65 Worse Than the National Rate 707
PSI_12 3.27 No Different Than the National Rate 1,055
PSI_13 5.54 No Different Than the National Rate 703
PSI_14 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_15 1.03 No Different Than the National Rate 145
PSI_90 1.13 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 87% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 2% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 11% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 5
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 93% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 85% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 2% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 13% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 82% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 2% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 16% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 87% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 2% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 11% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 5
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 92% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 84% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 2% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 14% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 83% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 3% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 14% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 66% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 15% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 4
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 80% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 4% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 16% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 52% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 26% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 22% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 11% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 89% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 17% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 83% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 6% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 94% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 83% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 5% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 12% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 5
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 65% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 6% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 29% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 3% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 9% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 88% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 5
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 1% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 90% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 9% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 5

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.248 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 4.887 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 2100.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 1.352 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.479 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 2.639 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 2128.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 1.135 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER — —
HAI_3_CIUPPER — —
HAI_3_DOPC — —
HAI_3_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_3_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_3_SIR — —
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC — —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER — —
HAI_5_CIUPPER — —
HAI_5_DOPC 6757.000 —
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 0.199 —
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_5_SIR — —
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.023 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 2.314 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 6757.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 2.131 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.469 No Different than National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV — Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 66.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a — Emergency Department
OP_18b — Emergency Department
OP_18c — Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 — Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 — Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 10.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 — Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR — Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR — Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 83.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 90.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -0.30 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -20.60 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN — Number of Cases Too Small
Hybrid_HWR 14.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 — —
OP_35_ADM — —
OP_35_ED — —
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 8.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_HF 18.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — —
READM_30_PN — Number of Cases Too Small

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.02

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 81 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.31 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 3.51 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 3.58 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $26,728,633 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-2,093,911 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $44,299,617 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -2.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $32,568,396 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $42,515,231 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $5,839,763 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -4.7% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.9% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 3601 NORTH WEBB ROAD — Address
General Information City/Town WICHITA — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 4 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 5 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 3 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 4 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 5 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 0 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 3 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish SEDGWICK — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services No — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 170186 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name KANSAS HEART HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State KS — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (316) 630-5000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 67226 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.27 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.72 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.34 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.02 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 0.9995 p11 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 11.6% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 296 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 28 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 10.7% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.77 1.0000 p0 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 9.8% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 300 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 16 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 7.6% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 0.9983 p6 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 18.7% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 191 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 25 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 16.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 8.33 5.00 p73 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 21.50 8.75 p96 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 8.33 10.00 p35 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 38.17 29.50 p75 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →