Hospital

DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 100258 · DELRAY BEACH, FL 33484 · PALM BEACH County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
5352 LINTON BLVD, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33484
Phone
(561) 498-4440
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
1 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
4
3
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
2
4
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
8
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 8 of 12 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 316 discharges
1.0198 p62
Heart Failure 881 discharges
0.9974 p49
Pneumonia 1,094 discharges
0.9953 p49
COPD 156 discharges
1.0355 p79
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.3055 p96
CABG Surgery 110 discharges
1.0816 p81
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

21.1 p19
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
13.3 p91
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
6.3 p19
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
1.5 p1
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.3055
Value-Based Purchasing
21.1 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.6129

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.90 No Different Than the National Rate 60
Hybrid_HWM 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate 3,235
MORT_30_AMI 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate 317
MORT_30_CABG 2.90 No Different Than the National Rate 114
MORT_30_COPD 6.20 No Different Than the National Rate 144
MORT_30_HF 8.30 Better Than the National Rate 747
MORT_30_PN 13.70 Better Than the National Rate 1,018
MORT_30_STK 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate 455
PSI_03 0.60 No Different Than the National Rate 11,142
PSI_04 114.48 Better Than the National Rate 170
PSI_06 0.17 No Different Than the National Rate 13,085
PSI_08 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 12,680
PSI_09 1.62 No Different Than the National Rate 3,129
PSI_10 1.64 No Different Than the National Rate 88
PSI_11 7.95 No Different Than the National Rate 89
PSI_12 5.83 Worse Than the National Rate 3,278
PSI_13 5.91 No Different Than the National Rate 84
PSI_14 1.53 No Different Than the National Rate 716
PSI_15 1.09 No Different Than the National Rate 1,966
PSI_90 1.05 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 60% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 25% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 1
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 66% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 23% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 56% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 16% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 28% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 56% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 17% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 27% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 62% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 23% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 69% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 20% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 61% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 16% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 23% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 57% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 17% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 26% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 46% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 36% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 61% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 20% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 19% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 30% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 51% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 19% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 29% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 71% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 1
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 33% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 67% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 26% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 74% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 54% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 20% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 26% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 1
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 43% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 23% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 34% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 1
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 26% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 28% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 46% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 20% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 44% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 36% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 1

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.452 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 2.043 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 6611.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 6.776 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 7.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.033 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.271 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.109 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 10088.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 13.699 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 8.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.584 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 1.434 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 4.297 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 205.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 5.043 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 13.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 2.578 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.335 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 6.601 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 134.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.001 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.998 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.007 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.703 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 97470.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 7.017 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.143 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.105 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.315 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 97470.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 68.726 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 13.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.189 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 8.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 3.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 38.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 160.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 157.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 206.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 33.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 19.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 47.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 64.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 73.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 70.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 90.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 84.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 14.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -5.70 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 10.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.00 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 6.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 15.90 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.02

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.07 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 3.24 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 3.49 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $260,183,241 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $56,325,015 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $466,698,115 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 11.0% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $293,702,400 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $358,722,595 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $33,519,159 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 11.9% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 3.9% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 5352 LINTON BLVD — Address
General Information City/Town DELRAY BEACH — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 8 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 4 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 3 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish PALM BEACH — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100258 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (561) 498-4440 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 33484 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.38 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.28 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.46 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.64 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 2.35 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.61 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.02 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9995 p62 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 316 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 49 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.08 1.0000 p81 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 12.5% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 110 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 17 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 13.5% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9969 p79 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.8% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 156 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 33 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.5% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9983 p49 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.5% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 881 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 180 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.5% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.31 0.9916 p96 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 7.7% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 10.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9955 p49 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.6% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 1,094 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 180 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 13.33 5.00 p91 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 1.50 8.75 p1 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 6.25 10.00 p19 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 21.08 29.50 p19 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →