Hospital

MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL

CCN: 360051 · DAYTON, OH 45409 · MONTGOMERY County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
ONE WYOMING STREET, DAYTON, OH 45409
Phone
(937) 208-3023
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
4
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
9
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 337 discharges
1.1843 p99
Heart Failure 986 discharges
1.0210 p64
Pneumonia 684 discharges
1.0649 p84
COPD 250 discharges
0.9930 p46
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.1904 p88
CABG Surgery 138 discharges
0.9704 p37
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

27.7 p43
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
13.3 p91
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
12.1 p62
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
2.3 p2
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1904
Value-Based Purchasing
27.7 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.5161

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.70 No Different Than the National Rate 79
Hybrid_HWM 3.30 Better Than the National Rate 3,885
MORT_30_AMI 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate 335
MORT_30_CABG 1.70 No Different Than the National Rate 142
MORT_30_COPD 7.50 No Different Than the National Rate 229
MORT_30_HF 9.10 Better Than the National Rate 863
MORT_30_PN 13.50 Better Than the National Rate 653
MORT_30_STK 14.10 No Different Than the National Rate 549
PSI_03 0.39 No Different Than the National Rate 14,059
PSI_04 175.82 No Different Than the National Rate 210
PSI_06 0.14 No Different Than the National Rate 16,790
PSI_08 0.24 No Different Than the National Rate 16,832
PSI_09 2.63 No Different Than the National Rate 3,762
PSI_10 0.95 No Different Than the National Rate 1,484
PSI_11 7.22 No Different Than the National Rate 1,426
PSI_12 2.97 No Different Than the National Rate 4,008
PSI_13 3.17 No Different Than the National Rate 1,468
PSI_14 2.45 No Different Than the National Rate 906
PSI_15 0.52 No Different Than the National Rate 3,414
PSI_90 0.72 Better Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 69% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 9% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 77% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 68% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 10% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 22% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 61% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 28% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 68% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 9% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 23% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 77% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 7% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 16% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 65% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 11% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 24% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 60% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 29% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 50% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 32% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 64% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 19% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 17% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 36% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 45% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 19% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 18% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 82% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 15% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 85% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 21% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 79% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 60% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 17% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 23% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 54% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 14% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 32% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 13% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 28% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 59% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 11% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 56% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 33% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.025 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.264 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 29314.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 30.970 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 3.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.097 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.200 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.537 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 31149.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 47.394 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 16.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.338 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.342 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.200 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 495.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 14.858 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.673 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.084 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 1.664 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 421.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 3.972 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.504 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.376 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.179 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 265671.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 17.300 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 12.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.694 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.183 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.360 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 245558.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 130.400 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 34.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.261 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 2.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 75.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 154.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 153.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 181.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 2.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 20.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 94.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 67.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 14.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 69.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 91.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 100.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 73.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 100.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 93.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 38.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -0.80 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 7.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.00 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 13.70 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 15.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 17.20 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.02

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.18 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 10.20 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 5.21 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $570,908,127 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $325,361,253 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,488,156,115 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 15.9% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,421,189,284 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,203,705,742 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $850,281,157 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 20.8% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.2% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address ONE WYOMING STREET — Address
General Information City/Town DAYTON — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 4 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MONTGOMERY — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 360051 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State OH — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (937) 208-3023 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 45409 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.35 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.33 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.06 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.90 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.78 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.52 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.02 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.18 0.9995 p99 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 337 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 60 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 1.0000 p37 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 138 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 14 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.7% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9969 p46 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.3% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 250 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 45 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.2% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9983 p64 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 986 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 199 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.19 0.9916 p88 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.9% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 7.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9955 p84 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 684 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 115 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 13.33 5.00 p91 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 2.25 8.75 p2 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 12.08 10.00 p62 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 27.67 29.50 p43 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →