Hospital

MOUNT SINAI BETH ISRAEL

CCN: 330169 · NEW YORK, NY 10003 · NEW YORK County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
281 1ST AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10003
Phone
(212) 420-2000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
2 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p7
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 6 of 7 measures reported
3
3
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 6 of 8 measures reported
2
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
7
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 119 discharges
0.9739 p32
Heart Failure 569 discharges
0.9982 p49
Pneumonia 554 discharges
1.1652 p98
COPD 134 discharges
1.1043 p97
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

31.3 p57
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
13.1 p91
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
15.4 p82
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
2.8 p3
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1652
Value-Based Purchasing
31.3 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.5756

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small —
Hybrid_HWM 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate 1,831
MORT_30_AMI 12.00 No Different Than the National Rate 148
MORT_30_CABG — — —
MORT_30_COPD 9.70 No Different Than the National Rate 128
MORT_30_HF 7.70 Better Than the National Rate 525
MORT_30_PN 12.60 Better Than the National Rate 583
MORT_30_STK 9.60 Better Than the National Rate 230
PSI_03 0.27 No Different Than the National Rate 7,990
PSI_04 148.44 No Different Than the National Rate 39
PSI_06 0.14 No Different Than the National Rate 9,236
PSI_08 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 9,516
PSI_09 2.16 No Different Than the National Rate 1,049
PSI_10 1.63 No Different Than the National Rate 94
PSI_11 12.16 No Different Than the National Rate 131
PSI_12 3.58 No Different Than the National Rate 1,046
PSI_13 6.37 No Different Than the National Rate 118
PSI_14 1.67 No Different Than the National Rate 184
PSI_15 0.81 No Different Than the National Rate 1,485
PSI_90 0.97 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 70% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 12% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 74% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 18% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 69% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 14% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 66% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 13% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 21% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 75% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 11% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 7% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 74% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 11% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 15% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 71% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 15% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 14% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 50% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 30% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 20% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 59% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 18% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 23% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 42% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 42% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 16% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 25% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 75% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 1
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 29% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 71% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 20% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 80% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 70% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 14% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 16% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 45% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 24% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 31% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 1
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 17% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 19% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 64% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 12% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 57% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 31% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER N/A Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.789 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 5279.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 3.799 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER N/A Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.424 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 9030.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 7.070 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.769 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 66.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 1.693 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 7.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.066 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.196 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.094 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 103000.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 3.899 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.769 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER N/A Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.071 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 103000.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 42.389 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 84.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 240.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 233.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 270.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 59.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 82.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 11.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 59.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 55.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 92.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 79.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 92.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 74.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 21.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 21.90 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 80.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.40 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 8.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.80 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG — —
READM_30_COPD 20.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 18.60 Worse Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.03

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 88 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.22 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 0.96 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 10.22 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $-46,773,101 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $107,766,000 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $2,946,083,909 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 61.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,288,218,646 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $908,030,790 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $1,334,991,747 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 8.6% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.7% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 281 1ST AVE — Address
General Information City/Town NEW YORK — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 6 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 6 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 3 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 3 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish NEW YORK — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 330169 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MOUNT SINAI BETH ISRAEL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 2 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NY — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (212) 420-2000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 10003 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.10 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.05 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.29 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 1.25 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.58 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.03 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9995 p32 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 15.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 119 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 16 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.6% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.10 0.9969 p97 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.6% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 134 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 35 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 20.5% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9983 p49 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 21.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 569 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 119 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.17 0.9955 p98 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 554 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 117 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 19.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 13.13 5.00 p91 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 2.75 8.75 p3 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 15.42 10.00 p82 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 31.29 29.50 p57 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →