Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
79-01 BROADWAY, ELMHURST, NY 11373
Phone
(718) 334-1141
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Government (Local)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
2 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p7
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 5 of 7 measures reported
5
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 6 of 8 measures reported
2
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 7 of 11 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 9 of 12 measures reported
9 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack)
1.0082 p55
Heart Failure 170 discharges
0.9927 p45
Pneumonia 128 discharges
0.9439 p17
COPD
0.9750 p29
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

18.3 p10
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
11.3 p86
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
1.3 p1
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
3.3 p6
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
2.5 p43
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0082
Value-Based Purchasing
18.3 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.2263

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
Hybrid_HWM 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate 579
MORT_30_AMI 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate 57
MORT_30_CABG
MORT_30_COPD 7.30 No Different Than the National Rate 54
MORT_30_HF 9.00 No Different Than the National Rate 158
MORT_30_PN 15.50 No Different Than the National Rate 125
MORT_30_STK 15.30 No Different Than the National Rate 90
PSI_03 1.14 No Different Than the National Rate 2,587
PSI_04 Number of Cases Too Small
PSI_06 0.37 No Different Than the National Rate 2,940
PSI_08 0.33 No Different Than the National Rate 2,845
PSI_09 2.18 No Different Than the National Rate 331
PSI_10 1.64 No Different Than the National Rate 41
PSI_11 8.01 No Different Than the National Rate 45
PSI_12 3.43 No Different Than the National Rate 322
PSI_13 5.01 No Different Than the National Rate 38
PSI_14 1.72 No Different Than the National Rate 52
PSI_15 1.00 No Different Than the National Rate 273
PSI_90 1.13 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 67%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 10%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 23%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 1
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 74%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 9%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 63%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 11%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 26%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 64%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 12%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 73%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 8%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 19%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 73%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 19%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 68%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 9%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 23%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 51%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 29%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 20%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 62%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 18%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 20%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 40%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 40%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 20%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 18%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 82%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 19%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 81%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 18%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 82%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 66%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 14%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 20%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 44%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 23%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 33%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 15%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 28%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 57%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 11%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 58%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 31%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.256 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.549 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 6820.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 7.154 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.699 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.132 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.002 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 6884.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 9.631 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.415 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.332 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.551 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 84.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 2.299 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.305 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC 65.000
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.519
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.258 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.560 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 108027.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 7.102 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.704 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.356 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.706 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 100219.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 64.900 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 33.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.508 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 2.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 62.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 265.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 255.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 534.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 2.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 48.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 5.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 26.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 48.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 84.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 68.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 69.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI Number of Cases Too Small
EDAC_30_HF -18.30 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -17.90 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.00 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 Number of cases too small
READM_30_AMI 13.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG
READM_30_COPD 17.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 15.00 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.07

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 83 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 1 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 9.93 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $528,227,140 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $106,964,050 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $917,565,097 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -13.8% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $392,043,790 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $858,290,949 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-283,690,972 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 9.3% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 29.1% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 79-01 BROADWAY Address
General Information City/Town ELMHURST City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 5 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 7 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 6 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 9 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 5 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish QUEENS County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 330128 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name ELMHURST HOSPITAL CENTER Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 2 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Government - Local Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NY State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (718) 334-1141 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 11373 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.65 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.34 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.49 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.79 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.06 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.23 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.07 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9995 p55 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.6% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 12.7% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9969 p29 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.6% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.2% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9983 p45 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.5% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 170 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 34 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.3% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9955 p17 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 14.7% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 128 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 14 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 13.9% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 11.25 5.00 p86 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 2.50 2.50 p43 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 3.25 8.75 p6 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 1.25 10.00 p1 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 18.25 29.50 p10 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →