Hospital

RICHMOND UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 330028 · STATEN ISLAND, NY 10310 · RICHMOND County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
355 BARD AVENUE, STATEN ISLAND, NY 10310
Phone
(718) 354-5047
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
1 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 6 of 7 measures reported
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 10 of 11 measures reported
9
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 6 of 12 measures reported
6 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack)
1.0001 p50
Heart Failure 126 discharges
1.0046 p54
Pneumonia 303 discharges
1.2130 p99
COPD 81 discharges
1.0103 p61
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.1466 p84
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

20.3 p17
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.0 p65
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
6.3 p19
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
2.0 p1
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
5.0 p56
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.2130
Value-Based Purchasing
20.3 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.8955

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.60 No Different Than the National Rate 33
Hybrid_HWM 4.70 No Different Than the National Rate 727
MORT_30_AMI 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate 69
MORT_30_CABG — — —
MORT_30_COPD 8.70 No Different Than the National Rate 79
MORT_30_HF 9.10 No Different Than the National Rate 109
MORT_30_PN 15.20 No Different Than the National Rate 319
MORT_30_STK 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate 90
PSI_03 0.18 No Different Than the National Rate 3,137
PSI_04 171.85 No Different Than the National Rate 44
PSI_06 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 3,589
PSI_08 0.24 No Different Than the National Rate 3,683
PSI_09 2.37 No Different Than the National Rate 484
PSI_10 1.63 No Different Than the National Rate 117
PSI_11 13.23 No Different Than the National Rate 123
PSI_12 4.61 No Different Than the National Rate 468
PSI_13 6.57 No Different Than the National Rate 119
PSI_14 1.69 No Different Than the National Rate 114
PSI_15 1.44 No Different Than the National Rate 571
PSI_90 1.08 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 68% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 10% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 75% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 7% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 18% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 64% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 10% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 26% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 64% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 25% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 70% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 10% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 20% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 77% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 7% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 16% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 69% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 10% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 21% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 65% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 51% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 30% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 65% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 18% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 17% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 36% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 42% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 22% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 20% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 80% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 23% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 77% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 17% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 83% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 59% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 15% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 26% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 37% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 29% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 34% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 1
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 21% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 36% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 43% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 17% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 42% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 41% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.907 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 2.720 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 7329.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 7.968 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 13.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.632 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.049 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.527 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 11049.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 15.485 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 3.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.194 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.033 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.299 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 60.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 1.495 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.669 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.736 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 7.873 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 128.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.037 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 2.893 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.193 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.065 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 61304.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 3.954 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.759 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.365 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.952 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 54767.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 28.021 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 17.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.607 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 63.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 201.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 202.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 193.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 49.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 17.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 38.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 49.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 81.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 73.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 90.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 82.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 41.90 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 11.60 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 84.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG — —
READM_30_COPD 18.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 19.50 Worse Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.01

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 89 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.20 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 0.43 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 12.02 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $87,708,053 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-18,483,499 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $380,053,310 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -36.5% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $563,513,166 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $380,876,747 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $475,805,113 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -3.7% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.8% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 355 BARD AVENUE — Address
General Information City/Town STATEN ISLAND — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 6 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 10 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 6 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 0 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 7 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish RICHMOND — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 330028 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name RICHMOND UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NY — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (718) 354-5047 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 10310 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.42 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.75 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.68 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 1.14 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.17 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.90 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.01 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9995 p50 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 12.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9969 p61 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.8% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 81 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 17 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 20.0% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9983 p54 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 18.7% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 126 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 24 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.8% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.15 0.9916 p84 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 4.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.21 0.9955 p99 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 303 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 78 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 21.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.00 5.00 p65 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 5.00 2.50 p56 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 2.00 8.75 p1 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 6.25 10.00 p19 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 20.25 29.50 p17 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →