Hospital

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

CCN: 330024 · NEW YORK, NY 10029 · NEW YORK County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
ONE GUSTAVE L LEVY PLACE, NEW YORK, NY 10029
Phone
(212) 241-7981
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
3
4
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
11
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 242 discharges
1.0301 p69
Heart Failure 892 discharges
0.9823 p38
Pneumonia 657 discharges
0.9637 p27
COPD 187 discharges
1.0378 p80
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.5766 p0
CABG Surgery
0.8439 p4
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

28.0 p45
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
12.9 p90
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
5.8 p17
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
6.8 p33
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
2.5 p43
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0378
Value-Based Purchasing
28.0 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.2342

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 2.70 No Different Than the National Rate 419
Hybrid_HWM 3.20 Better Than the National Rate 4,395
MORT_30_AMI 12.50 No Different Than the National Rate 151
MORT_30_CABG 1.50 No Different Than the National Rate 144
MORT_30_COPD 7.60 No Different Than the National Rate 165
MORT_30_HF 7.50 Better Than the National Rate 763
MORT_30_PN 13.80 Better Than the National Rate 683
MORT_30_STK 10.90 Better Than the National Rate 375
PSI_03 0.93 No Different Than the National Rate 15,577
PSI_04 172.14 No Different Than the National Rate 260
PSI_06 0.08 No Different Than the National Rate 19,045
PSI_08 0.36 No Different Than the National Rate 20,760
PSI_09 1.62 No Different Than the National Rate 7,428
PSI_10 1.36 No Different Than the National Rate 3,840
PSI_11 7.64 No Different Than the National Rate 3,845
PSI_12 4.47 No Different Than the National Rate 7,869
PSI_13 4.23 No Different Than the National Rate 4,008
PSI_14 1.19 No Different Than the National Rate 1,428
PSI_15 1.56 No Different Than the National Rate 4,503
PSI_90 1.03 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 74% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 21% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 71% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 23% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 69% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 78% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 77% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 18% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 21% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 57% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 22% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 21% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 73% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 9% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 42% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 35% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 23% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 15% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 85% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 19% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 81% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 10% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 90% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 64% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 12% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 24% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 44% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 22% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 34% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 10% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 21% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 69% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 6% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 69% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 25% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.695 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.339 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 34892.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 36.829 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 36.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.977 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.240 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.567 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 39933.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 55.684 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 21.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.377 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.270 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.893 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 774.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 21.415 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 11.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.514 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.814 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 4.179 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 354.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.986 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 6.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 2.009 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.345 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.957 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 347072.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 25.267 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 15.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.594 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.480 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.685 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 317966.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 211.886 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 122.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.576 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 83.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 242.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 244.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 191.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 2.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 65.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 88.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 47.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 13.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 46.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 42.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 85.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 80.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 86.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 89.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 11.80 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 13.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 19.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 12.90 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 3.90 Better Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 8.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 2.90 Better Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 15.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.98

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 94 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.25 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.84 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 11.88 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $2,315,245,000 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-385,788,000 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $3,491,073,239 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -14.2% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $5,774,179,000 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $3,109,990,390 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $3,458,934,000 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -9.8% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.6% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address ONE GUSTAVE L LEVY PLACE — Address
General Information City/Town NEW YORK — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 3 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 11 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish NEW YORK — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 330024 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NY — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (212) 241-7981 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 10029 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.43 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.58 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.97 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.61 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.78 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.23 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.98 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9995 p69 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 15.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 242 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 39 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.5% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.84 1.0000 p4 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.2% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 8.6% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9969 p80 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 20.2% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 187 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 42 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 20.9% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9983 p38 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.3% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 892 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 177 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.58 0.9916 p0 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 4.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 2.7% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.96 0.9955 p27 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.9% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 657 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 98 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.3% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 12.92 5.00 p90 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 2.50 2.50 p43 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 6.75 8.75 p33 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 5.83 10.00 p17 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 28.00 29.50 p45 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →