Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
94 OLD SHORT HILLS ROAD, LIVINGSTON, NJ 07039
Phone
(973) 322-5000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
4
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
9
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 168 discharges
1.1309 p96
Heart Failure 703 discharges
0.9623 p25
Pneumonia 717 discharges
1.0341 p72
COPD 161 discharges
1.0335 p78
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.0659 p70
CABG Surgery 132 discharges
1.0511 p70
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

15.8 p6
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
3.3 p33
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
7.5 p27
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
5.0 p19
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1309
Value-Based Purchasing
15.8 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.3448

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.20 No Different Than the National Rate 55
Hybrid_HWM 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate 2,667
MORT_30_AMI 11.90 No Different Than the National Rate 150
MORT_30_CABG 2.90 No Different Than the National Rate 137
MORT_30_COPD 8.20 No Different Than the National Rate 144
MORT_30_HF 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate 631
MORT_30_PN 18.00 No Different Than the National Rate 774
MORT_30_STK 12.90 No Different Than the National Rate 318
PSI_03 0.38 No Different Than the National Rate 10,444
PSI_04 227.59 Worse Than the National Rate 165
PSI_06 0.15 No Different Than the National Rate 12,045
PSI_08 0.33 No Different Than the National Rate 12,482
PSI_09 2.91 No Different Than the National Rate 3,225
PSI_10 1.11 No Different Than the National Rate 1,230
PSI_11 6.66 No Different Than the National Rate 1,358
PSI_12 6.12 Worse Than the National Rate 3,321
PSI_13 3.57 No Different Than the National Rate 1,350
PSI_14 2.18 No Different Than the National Rate 1,081
PSI_15 1.02 No Different Than the National Rate 2,913
PSI_90 0.90 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 77%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 18%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 74%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 20%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 73%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 77%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 84%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 76%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 18%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 72%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 21%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 60%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 22%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 74%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 12%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 14%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 47%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 32%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 18%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 82%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 22%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 78%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 14%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 86%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 66%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 11%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 23%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 55%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 16%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 29%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 11%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 24%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 65%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 8%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 68%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 24%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.138 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.624 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 19021.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 22.204 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 7.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.315 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.136 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.558 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 18843.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 27.220 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 8.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.294 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.628 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 2.204 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 312.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 8.088 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.236 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 1.028 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 4.204 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 482.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 3.614 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 8.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 2.214 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.456 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.430 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 182144.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 14.269 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 12.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.841 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.270 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.536 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 169746.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 85.470 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 33.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.386 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 97.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 108.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 108.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 89.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 18.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 71.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 86.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 92.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 86.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 68.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 58.90 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 9.20 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 32.00 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.90 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 15.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.50 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.05

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.22 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 7.08 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 5.63 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,337,520,811 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $43,811,577 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,185,834,568 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 1.5% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $2,028,489,751 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,024,248,972 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $690,968,940 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 3.6% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.3% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 94 OLD SHORT HILLS ROAD Address
General Information City/Town LIVINGSTON City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 7 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 4 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish ESSEX County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 310076 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NJ State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (973) 322-5000 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 07039 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.35 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.32 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.31 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.52 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.02 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.34 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.05 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.13 0.9995 p96 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.5% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 168 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 34 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 16.4% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 1.0000 p70 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.3% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 132 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 17 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 11.9% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9969 p78 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 17.2% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 161 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 31 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 17.7% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.96 0.9983 p25 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.5% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 703 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 129 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.7% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 0.9916 p70 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.7% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.0% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9955 p72 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.5% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 717 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 117 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.0% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 3.33 5.00 p33 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 5.00 8.75 p19 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 7.50 10.00 p27 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 15.83 29.50 p6 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →