Hospital

LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 100157 · LAKELAND, FL 33805 · POLK County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
1324 LAKELAND HILLS BLVD, LAKELAND, FL 33805
Phone
(863) 687-1100
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
1 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
4
2
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
2
6
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
8
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 297 discharges
0.9157 p8
Heart Failure 1,095 discharges
1.0865 p90
Pneumonia 936 discharges
1.1637 p98
COPD 447 discharges
1.1325 p98
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.9220 p30
CABG Surgery
1.0220 p58
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

16.1 p6
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.5 p67
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
3.3 p5
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
5.3 p21
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1637
Value-Based Purchasing
16.1 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.8472

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 2.90 No Different Than the National Rate 182
Hybrid_HWM 3.60 No Different Than the National Rate 3,623
MORT_30_AMI 15.70 Worse Than the National Rate 316
MORT_30_CABG 3.50 No Different Than the National Rate 89
MORT_30_COPD 10.40 No Different Than the National Rate 393
MORT_30_HF 8.40 Better Than the National Rate 934
MORT_30_PN 17.40 No Different Than the National Rate 915
MORT_30_STK 14.90 No Different Than the National Rate 315
PSI_03 2.08 Worse Than the National Rate 13,559
PSI_04 205.79 No Different Than the National Rate 181
PSI_06 0.10 No Different Than the National Rate 16,190
PSI_08 0.42 No Different Than the National Rate 16,335
PSI_09 1.93 No Different Than the National Rate 3,083
PSI_10 3.17 Worse Than the National Rate 1,031
PSI_11 9.33 No Different Than the National Rate 1,084
PSI_12 5.06 No Different Than the National Rate 3,037
PSI_13 5.31 No Different Than the National Rate 918
PSI_14 2.09 No Different Than the National Rate 590
PSI_15 0.76 No Different Than the National Rate 3,287
PSI_90 1.55 Worse Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 77% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 74% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 21% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 74% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 19% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 81% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 20% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 69% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 9% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 22% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 60% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 22% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 75% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 10% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 44% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 35% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 19% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 81% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 24% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 76% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 14% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 86% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 65% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 14% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 21% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 54% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 13% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 33% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 11% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 22% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 67% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 7% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 66% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 27% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.866 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.970 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 16139.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 17.239 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 23.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.334 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.333 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.788 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 23206.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 40.061 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 21.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.524 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.098 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.746 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 475.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 12.939 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 4.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.309 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.343 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 3.666 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 250.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.227 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.347 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 1.333 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.673 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 269236.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 16.698 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 32.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.916 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.371 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.540 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 261597.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 242.577 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 109.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.449 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 89.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 173.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 172.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 198.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 94.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 88.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 61.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 14.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 53.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 77.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 85.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 74.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 94.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 93.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 0.00 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 17.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 50.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.70 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 14.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 11.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.30 Worse than expected
READM_30_AMI 12.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 20.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 18.60 Worse Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.00

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 93 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.67 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 6.37 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $429,284,443 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $114,419,715 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,033,363,360 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 8.8% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,119,488,777 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $883,311,477 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $654,001,200 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 10.8% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 7.4% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 1324 LAKELAND HILLS BLVD — Address
General Information City/Town LAKELAND — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 2 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish POLK — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100157 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (863) 687-1100 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 33805 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.49 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.43 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.29 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 1.29 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.68 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.85 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.00 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9995 p8 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 297 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 34 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 1.0000 p58 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.5% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.7% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.13 0.9969 p98 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.1% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 447 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 106 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 21.6% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 0.9983 p90 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,095 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 232 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9916 p30 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.5% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.16 0.9955 p98 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.3% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 936 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 177 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.50 5.00 p67 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 5.25 8.75 p21 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 3.33 10.00 p5 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 16.08 29.50 p6 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →