Hospital

EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 050573 · RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 · RIVERSIDE County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
39-000 BOB HOPE DRIVE, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
Phone
(760) 340-3911
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
4 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
3
8
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 422 discharges
1.0229 p64
Heart Failure 1,046 discharges
1.0592 p82
Pneumonia 970 discharges
0.9523 p20
COPD 218 discharges
0.9638 p19
Hip/Knee Replacement 654 discharges
0.6650 p1
CABG Surgery 132 discharges
0.9755 p39
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

31.7 p58
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
9.6 p80
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
10.8 p53
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
8.8 p49
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
2.5 p43
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0592
Value-Based Purchasing
31.7 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.4630

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 2.40 Better Than the National Rate 675
Hybrid_HWM 4.30 No Different Than the National Rate 4,105
MORT_30_AMI 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate 359
MORT_30_CABG 2.30 No Different Than the National Rate 133
MORT_30_COPD 10.60 No Different Than the National Rate 193
MORT_30_HF 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate 880
MORT_30_PN 16.20 No Different Than the National Rate 899
MORT_30_STK 11.00 No Different Than the National Rate 458
PSI_03 0.09 Better Than the National Rate 10,736
PSI_04 144.87 No Different Than the National Rate 150
PSI_06 0.31 No Different Than the National Rate 14,622
PSI_08 0.31 No Different Than the National Rate 15,563
PSI_09 2.28 No Different Than the National Rate 4,469
PSI_10 1.19 No Different Than the National Rate 2,294
PSI_11 8.26 No Different Than the National Rate 2,258
PSI_12 2.23 No Different Than the National Rate 4,726
PSI_13 4.78 No Different Than the National Rate 2,297
PSI_14 1.78 No Different Than the National Rate 1,029
PSI_15 1.01 No Different Than the National Rate 3,062
PSI_90 0.74 Better Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 77% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 84% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 73% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 22% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 72% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 22% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 75% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 74% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 19% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 70% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 22% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 57% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 24% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 70% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 12% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 44% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 36% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 20% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 15% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 85% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 17% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 83% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 13% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 87% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 71% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 10% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 19% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 47% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 16% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 37% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 8% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 18% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 74% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 4% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 79% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 17% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.071 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.535 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 17856.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 18.025 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 4.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.222 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.110 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.564 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 17509.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 22.114 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 6.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.271 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.511 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.792 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 397.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 9.945 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.006 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 1.875 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 197.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.598 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.239 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.814 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 93108.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 5.320 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.752 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.167 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.500 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 92189.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 43.375 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 13.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.300 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 94.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 260.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 259.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c — Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 41.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 99.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 47.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 19.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 54.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 44.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 92.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 84.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -3.20 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 2.60 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -9.00 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 9.50 Better Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.60 Better than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 3.30 Better Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 15.20 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.00

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 98 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.18 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.37 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 10.35 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,011,855,895 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $46,124,564 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,188,712,136 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -5.2% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,647,706,268 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $920,516,354 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $635,850,373 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 3.6% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 0.4% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 39-000 BOB HOPE DRIVE — Address
General Information City/Town RANCHO MIRAGE — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 3 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish RIVERSIDE — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 050573 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State CA — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (760) 340-3911 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 92270 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.51 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.33 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.45 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.38 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.84 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.46 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.00 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9995 p64 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.5% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 422 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 55 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 12.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 1.0000 p39 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 9.8% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 132 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 12 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 9.6% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.96 0.9969 p19 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.4% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 218 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 36 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 17.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9983 p82 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.7% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,046 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 223 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.67 0.9916 p1 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.1% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 654 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 22 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.1% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.95 0.9955 p20 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.0% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 970 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 145 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.3% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 9.58 5.00 p80 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 2.50 2.50 p43 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 8.75 8.75 p49 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 10.83 10.00 p53 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 31.67 29.50 p58 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →