Hospital

NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 030085 · TUCSON, AZ 85741 · PIMA County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
6200 NORTH LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD, TUCSON, AZ 85741
Phone
(520) 469-8100
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
2 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p7
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
6
1
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
4
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 10 of 11 measures reported
10
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 279 discharges
0.9960 p47
Heart Failure 438 discharges
0.9584 p23
Pneumonia 364 discharges
0.9113 p6
COPD 94 discharges
1.0291 p75
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.9234 p30
CABG Surgery 119 discharges
1.0329 p63
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

21.5 p21
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.9 p71
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
12.1 p62
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
1.5 p1
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0329
Value-Based Purchasing
21.5 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.8103

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.40 No Different Than the National Rate 35
Hybrid_HWM 5.00 No Different Than the National Rate 1,931
MORT_30_AMI 13.60 No Different Than the National Rate 260
MORT_30_CABG 2.00 No Different Than the National Rate 121
MORT_30_COPD 8.10 No Different Than the National Rate 90
MORT_30_HF 14.30 No Different Than the National Rate 389
MORT_30_PN 19.10 No Different Than the National Rate 356
MORT_30_STK 14.60 No Different Than the National Rate 163
PSI_03 0.55 No Different Than the National Rate 4,942
PSI_04 188.06 No Different Than the National Rate 76
PSI_06 0.19 No Different Than the National Rate 6,164
PSI_08 0.29 No Different Than the National Rate 6,579
PSI_09 2.01 No Different Than the National Rate 1,729
PSI_10 1.86 No Different Than the National Rate 888
PSI_11 4.96 No Different Than the National Rate 842
PSI_12 3.02 No Different Than the National Rate 1,878
PSI_13 3.08 No Different Than the National Rate 848
PSI_14 1.52 No Different Than the National Rate 503
PSI_15 0.88 No Different Than the National Rate 1,566
PSI_90 0.76 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 70% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 8% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 16% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 66% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 9% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 25% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 65% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 10% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 25% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 68% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 11% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 21% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 75% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 65% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 12% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 23% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 63% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 12% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 25% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 51% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 30% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 64% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 17% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 19% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 38% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 43% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 19% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 20% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 80% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 24% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 76% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 16% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 84% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 58% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 18% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 24% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 1
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 38% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 24% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 38% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 1
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 20% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 29% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 51% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 15% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 50% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 35% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 1

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.125 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.342 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 6469.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 6.084 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.493 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.045 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.886 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 7528.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 7.462 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 2.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.268 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.226 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.369 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 319.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 8.097 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.618 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 105.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.817 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.020 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.942 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 57306.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 2.539 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.394 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.172 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.567 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 53132.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 33.726 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 11.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.326 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV medium Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 42.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 245.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 238.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 429.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 604.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 49.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 98.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 13.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 50.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 50.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 73.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 73.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 84.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 12.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -3.00 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -21.30 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 14.50 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.01

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 94 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Employees per Bed 4.39 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $395,558,380 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $4,782,166 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $343,673,761 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 0.8% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $302,836,046 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $322,735,093 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-92,722,334 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 1.4% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.4% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 6200 NORTH LA CHOLLA BOULEVARD — Address
General Information City/Town TUCSON — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 10 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 1 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 10 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 4 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish PIMA — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 030085 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 2 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State AZ — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (520) 469-8100 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 85741 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.18 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.41 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.20 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.72 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.81 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.01 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9995 p47 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 10.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 279 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 30 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 10.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 1.0000 p63 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 9.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 119 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 12 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 9.4% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9969 p75 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 16.5% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 94 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 18 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 16.9% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.96 0.9983 p23 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 17.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 438 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 72 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 17.1% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9916 p30 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.5% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.91 0.9955 p6 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 14.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 364 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 42 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 13.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.92 5.00 p71 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 1.50 8.75 p1 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 12.08 10.00 p62 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 21.50 29.50 p21 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →