Hospital

GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 390006 · DANVILLE, PA 17822 · MONTOUR County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
100 NORTH ACADEMY AVENUE, DANVILLE, PA 17822
Phone
(570) 271-6211
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
4 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
2
5
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
1
9
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 341 discharges
0.9226 p10
Heart Failure 586 discharges
1.0837 p89
Pneumonia 498 discharges
1.0900 p90
COPD 172 discharges
0.9373 p5
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.8397 p11
CABG Surgery 141 discharges
1.0232 p59
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

26.1 p37
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
12.5 p89
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
4.6 p11
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
9.0 p51
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0900
Value-Based Purchasing
26.1 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.5291

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.50 No Different Than the National Rate 48
Hybrid_HWM 3.20 Better Than the National Rate 2,455
MORT_30_AMI 11.10 No Different Than the National Rate 263
MORT_30_CABG 1.50 No Different Than the National Rate 141
MORT_30_COPD 8.40 No Different Than the National Rate 165
MORT_30_HF 11.70 No Different Than the National Rate 502
MORT_30_PN 12.00 Better Than the National Rate 471
MORT_30_STK 13.20 No Different Than the National Rate 317
PSI_03 0.97 No Different Than the National Rate 9,906
PSI_04 208.10 No Different Than the National Rate 243
PSI_06 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 11,450
PSI_08 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 11,860
PSI_09 1.25 No Different Than the National Rate 3,418
PSI_10 0.89 No Different Than the National Rate 1,657
PSI_11 8.37 No Different Than the National Rate 1,638
PSI_12 2.81 No Different Than the National Rate 3,644
PSI_13 4.36 No Different Than the National Rate 1,597
PSI_14 1.51 No Different Than the National Rate 907
PSI_15 1.82 No Different Than the National Rate 2,867
PSI_90 0.97 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 81% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 16% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 87% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 3% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 18% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 79% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 78% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 21% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 59% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 21% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 20% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 74% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 9% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 17% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 45% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 32% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 23% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 13% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 87% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 14% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 86% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 11% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 89% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 74% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 7% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 19% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 49% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 16% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 35% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 7% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 21% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 72% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 4% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 70% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 26% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.377 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.931 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 29080.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 31.281 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 19.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.607 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.364 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.844 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 25440.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 38.836 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 22.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.566 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 1.309 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.034 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 404.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 10.800 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 22.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 2.037 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.488 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 5.217 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 180.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.565 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.917 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.148 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.762 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 171682.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 16.384 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 6.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.366 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.590 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.914 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 158369.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 108.316 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 80.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.739 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 95.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 169.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 163.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 327.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 99.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 59.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 53.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 76.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 81.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 76.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 91.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -9.60 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 35.00 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 30.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 13.40 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.80 Better than expected
READM_30_AMI 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 17.50 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.99

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.11 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.17 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 10.22 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $316,265,350 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $291,585,589 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,849,931,984 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 10.5% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,314,138,414 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,291,780,538 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $997,873,064 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 14.7% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.1% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 100 NORTH ACADEMY AVENUE — Address
General Information City/Town DANVILLE — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MONTOUR — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 390006 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State PA — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (570) 271-6211 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 17822 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.57 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.86 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.66 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.39 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.90 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.53 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.99 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9995 p10 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.1% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 341 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 37 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 12.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 1.0000 p59 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 141 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 15 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.2% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9969 p5 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 20.4% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 172 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 28 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.1% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.08 0.9983 p89 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 586 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 132 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.5% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.84 0.9916 p11 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.4% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 0.9955 p90 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.4% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 498 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 95 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.9% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 12.50 5.00 p89 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 9.00 8.75 p51 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 4.58 10.00 p11 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 26.08 29.50 p37 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →