Hospital

REX HOSPITAL

CCN: 340114 · RALEIGH, NC 27607 · WAKE County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
4420 LAKE BOONE TRAIL, RALEIGH, NC 27607
Phone
(919) 784-3100
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Government (State)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
3
4
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
1
7
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
1
10
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 550 discharges
0.9766 p34
Heart Failure 1,307 discharges
0.9823 p38
Pneumonia 651 discharges
1.0065 p57
COPD 200 discharges
0.9039 p1
Hip/Knee Replacement 176 discharges
1.1217 p80
CABG Surgery 249 discharges
0.8601 p5
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

46.3 p89
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
15.4 p94
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
6.7 p21
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
14.3 p81
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
10.0 p76
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1217
Value-Based Purchasing
46.3 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.5908

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 2.50 No Different Than the National Rate 196
Hybrid_HWM 3.50 Better Than the National Rate 3,860
MORT_30_AMI 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate 453
MORT_30_CABG 1.50 No Different Than the National Rate 250
MORT_30_COPD 8.70 No Different Than the National Rate 194
MORT_30_HF 8.10 Better Than the National Rate 1,116
MORT_30_PN 13.20 Better Than the National Rate 647
MORT_30_STK 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate 392
PSI_03 1.39 Worse Than the National Rate 12,134
PSI_04 158.96 No Different Than the National Rate 202
PSI_06 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate 14,264
PSI_08 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 15,123
PSI_09 2.44 No Different Than the National Rate 4,449
PSI_10 1.48 No Different Than the National Rate 2,227
PSI_11 10.28 No Different Than the National Rate 2,145
PSI_12 3.62 No Different Than the National Rate 4,718
PSI_13 4.14 No Different Than the National Rate 2,121
PSI_14 1.35 No Different Than the National Rate 1,045
PSI_15 0.62 No Different Than the National Rate 2,944
PSI_90 1.19 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 81% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 18% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 82% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 81% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 15% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 17% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 62% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 20% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 77% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 8% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 48% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 31% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 13% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 87% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 15% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 85% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 11% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 89% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 75% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 6% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 19% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 61% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 10% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 29% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 5% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 15% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 80% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 82% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 15% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.062 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.470 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 20145.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 20.525 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 4.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.195 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.495 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.224 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 16956.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 23.785 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 19.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.799 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.377 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.086 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 779.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 21.117 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 14.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.663 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.365 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 3.905 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 255.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.091 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.435 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.184 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.942 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 184222.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 13.244 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 6.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.453 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.292 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.579 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 170752.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 79.081 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 33.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.417 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 97.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 197.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 191.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 382.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 67.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 98.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 63.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 16.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 59.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 73.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 70.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 80.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 92.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -2.00 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -9.60 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 6.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 14.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 9.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 6.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.10 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 16.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.00 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.93

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 98 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.28 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.83 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 8.15 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,071,037,000 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $78,861,000 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,610,513,000 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -0.5% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,867,014,000 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,134,963,551 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $795,977,000 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 4.5% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 3.2% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 4420 LAKE BOONE TRAIL — Address
General Information City/Town RALEIGH — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 3 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 10 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 7 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish WAKE — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 340114 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name REX HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Government - State — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NC — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (919) 784-3100 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 27607 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.87 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.58 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.55 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 1.06 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.84 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.59 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.93 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9995 p34 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.6% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 550 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 72 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.3% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.86 1.0000 p5 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.2% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 249 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 18 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 8.8% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 0.9969 p1 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 16.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 200 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 23 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 15.1% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9983 p38 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.4% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,307 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 248 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 19.1% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.12 0.9916 p80 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.4% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 176 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 12 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.1% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9955 p57 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 14.7% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 651 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 97 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 14.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 15.42 5.00 p94 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 10.00 2.50 p76 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 14.25 8.75 p81 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 6.67 10.00 p21 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 46.33 29.50 p89 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →