Hospital

LOVELACE MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 320009 · ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102 · BERNALILLO County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
601 DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE NE, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87102
Phone
(505) 727-8000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
4
3
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
8
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 9 of 12 measures reported
9 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 373 discharges
0.9211 p10
Heart Failure 488 discharges
0.8922 p4
Pneumonia 217 discharges
1.0440 p77
COPD
0.9774 p31
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.9009 p25
CABG Surgery 171 discharges
1.0660 p76
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

21.1 p19
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
2.9 p29
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
11.7 p59
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
6.5 p31
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0660
Value-Based Purchasing
21.1 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.0393

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.80 No Different Than the National Rate 93
Hybrid_HWM 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate 1,557
MORT_30_AMI 11.40 No Different Than the National Rate 284
MORT_30_CABG 3.40 No Different Than the National Rate 178
MORT_30_COPD 9.20 No Different Than the National Rate 40
MORT_30_HF 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate 393
MORT_30_PN 16.20 No Different Than the National Rate 204
MORT_30_STK 12.80 No Different Than the National Rate 121
PSI_03 1.52 Worse Than the National Rate 4,327
PSI_04 214.53 Worse Than the National Rate 117
PSI_06 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 5,471
PSI_08 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate 5,891
PSI_09 2.57 No Different Than the National Rate 1,783
PSI_10 1.41 No Different Than the National Rate 821
PSI_11 12.37 No Different Than the National Rate 842
PSI_12 4.98 No Different Than the National Rate 2,027
PSI_13 6.93 No Different Than the National Rate 805
PSI_14 1.61 No Different Than the National Rate 314
PSI_15 1.00 No Different Than the National Rate 1,166
PSI_90 1.44 Worse Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 76% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 22% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 73% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 74% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 8% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 80% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 20% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 68% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 9% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 23% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 55% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 25% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 20% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 68% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 14% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 43% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 36% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 18% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 82% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 19% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 81% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 18% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 82% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 69% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 11% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 20% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 54% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 12% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 34% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 11% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 23% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 66% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 9% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 67% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 24% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.715 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 2.509 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 7115.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 7.105 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.407 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.067 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.715 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 9988.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 11.424 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 3.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.263 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER N/A Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.596 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 184.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 5.023 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 13.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.105 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.015 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.431 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 64431.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 3.446 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.290 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.241 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.647 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 64431.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 39.300 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 16.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.407 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV medium Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 76.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 221.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 219.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 248.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 2.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 95.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 70.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 74.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 83.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 97.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 94.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 0.80 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -13.40 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 35.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 12.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.60 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.00

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 94 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.12 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.16 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 6.35 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $10,233,845 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-27,285,492 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $337,187,248 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -10.2% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $85,128,495 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $308,259,498 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $74,894,650 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -7.9% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.7% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 601 DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE NE — Address
General Information City/Town ALBUQUERQUE — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 9 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 7 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 4 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 3 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish BERNALILLO — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 320009 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name LOVELACE MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NM — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (505) 727-8000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 87102 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.18 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.38 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.74 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.35 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.04 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.00 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9995 p10 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 373 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 38 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 11.3% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 1.0000 p76 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 171 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 20 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.7% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9969 p31 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 16.6% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 16.2% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.89 0.9983 p4 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 18.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 488 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 73 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 16.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 0.9916 p25 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.2% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.7% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9955 p77 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.4% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 217 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 40 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.1% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 2.92 5.00 p29 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 6.50 8.75 p31 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 11.67 10.00 p59 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 21.08 29.50 p19 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →