Hospital

CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 290054 · LAS VEGAS, NV 89149 · CLARK County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
6900 N DURANGO DR, LAS VEGAS, NV 89149
Phone
(702) 835-9700
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
1 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 6 of 7 measures reported
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
2
6
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 8 of 11 measures reported
5
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 9 of 12 measures reported
9 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack)
0.9764 p34
Heart Failure 299 discharges
0.9600 p24
Pneumonia 404 discharges
1.0912 p90
COPD 127 discharges
1.0490 p85
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.0328 p61
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

14.0 p3
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
2.0 p21
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
10.0 p47
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
2.0 p1
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0912
Value-Based Purchasing
14.0 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.3998

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.10 No Different Than the National Rate 177
Hybrid_HWM 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate 1,376
MORT_30_AMI 13.30 No Different Than the National Rate 100
MORT_30_CABG — — —
MORT_30_COPD 10.90 No Different Than the National Rate 113
MORT_30_HF 12.50 No Different Than the National Rate 244
MORT_30_PN 18.00 No Different Than the National Rate 382
MORT_30_STK 16.20 No Different Than the National Rate 168
PSI_03 0.40 No Different Than the National Rate 4,335
PSI_04 170.07 No Different Than the National Rate 58
PSI_06 0.16 No Different Than the National Rate 5,862
PSI_08 0.34 No Different Than the National Rate 5,971
PSI_09 1.91 No Different Than the National Rate 954
PSI_10 1.66 No Different Than the National Rate 147
PSI_11 8.19 No Different Than the National Rate 156
PSI_12 3.12 No Different Than the National Rate 961
PSI_13 5.76 No Different Than the National Rate 142
PSI_14 1.62 No Different Than the National Rate 255
PSI_15 0.86 No Different Than the National Rate 1,124
PSI_90 0.89 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 70% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 8% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 64% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 9% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 27% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 65% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 10% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 25% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 68% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 10% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 22% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 75% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 64% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 11% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 25% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 64% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 25% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 51% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 30% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 64% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 17% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 19% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 38% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 42% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 20% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 19% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 81% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 21% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 79% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 18% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 82% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 64% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 14% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 22% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 53% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 14% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 33% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 14% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 25% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 61% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 11% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 59% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 30% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.559 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 2.105 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 7505.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 7.845 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 9.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.147 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.152 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.151 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 6907.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 8.381 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.477 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.015 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.459 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 122.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 3.381 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.296 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.653 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 128.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.129 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.120 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.281 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 100697.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 6.372 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.471 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.064 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.263 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 94888.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 57.755 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 8.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.139 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 42.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 167.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 164.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 485.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 96.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 14.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 52.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 54.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 83.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 91.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 92.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -19.30 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -18.70 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 30.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 1.10 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG — —
READM_30_COPD 19.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 17.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.08

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 89 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.06 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 3.08 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 3.86 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $397,794,471 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $30,619,770 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $326,088,352 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 8.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $278,356,801 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $269,995,084 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-119,437,670 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 9.3% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.9% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 6900 N DURANGO DR — Address
General Information City/Town LAS VEGAS — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 6 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 8 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 9 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 5 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish CLARK — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 290054 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NV — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (702) 835-9700 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 89149 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.32 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.16 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.96 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.58 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.34 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.40 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.08 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9995 p34 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 15.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 0.9969 p85 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 16.9% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 127 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 26 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 17.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.96 0.9983 p24 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.8% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 299 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 54 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 19.1% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9916 p61 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 4.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.1% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 0.9955 p90 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.9% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 404 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 76 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.3% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 2.00 5.00 p21 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 2.00 8.75 p1 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 10.00 10.00 p47 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 14.00 29.50 p3 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →