Hospital

MOUNTAINVIEW HOSPITAL

CCN: 290039 · LAS VEGAS, NV 89128 · CLARK County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
3100 N TENAYA WAY, LAS VEGAS, NV 89128
Phone
(702) 255-5000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
11
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 257 discharges
1.0993 p93
Heart Failure 801 discharges
0.9424 p16
Pneumonia 951 discharges
1.0383 p74
COPD 177 discharges
1.0470 p84
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.8338 p10
CABG Surgery 105 discharges
1.0908 p84
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

32.4 p61
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
12.9 p90
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
13.8 p73
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
5.8 p25
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0993
Value-Based Purchasing
32.4 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.3177

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 2.90 No Different Than the National Rate 192
Hybrid_HWM 3.10 Better Than the National Rate 2,721
MORT_30_AMI 9.60 No Different Than the National Rate 226
MORT_30_CABG 2.50 No Different Than the National Rate 108
MORT_30_COPD 10.20 No Different Than the National Rate 167
MORT_30_HF 6.20 Better Than the National Rate 663
MORT_30_PN 13.20 Better Than the National Rate 884
MORT_30_STK 14.60 No Different Than the National Rate 211
PSI_03 0.18 No Different Than the National Rate 9,400
PSI_04 178.36 No Different Than the National Rate 163
PSI_06 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 11,202
PSI_08 0.18 No Different Than the National Rate 11,659
PSI_09 1.65 No Different Than the National Rate 2,257
PSI_10 1.31 No Different Than the National Rate 929
PSI_11 21.08 Worse Than the National Rate 972
PSI_12 2.47 No Different Than the National Rate 2,332
PSI_13 6.91 No Different Than the National Rate 973
PSI_14 1.48 No Different Than the National Rate 598
PSI_15 0.66 No Different Than the National Rate 2,252
PSI_90 1.13 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 75% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 20% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 22% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 68% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 25% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 69% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 8% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 23% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 76% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 18% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 69% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 9% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 22% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 62% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 10% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 28% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 52% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 25% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 23% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 68% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 11% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 21% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 37% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 40% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 23% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 16% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 84% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 16% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 84% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 16% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 84% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 72% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 9% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 19% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 56% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 12% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 32% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 9% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 22% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 69% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 7% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 68% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 25% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.023 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.452 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 13920.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 14.633 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 2.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.137 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.020 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.401 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 11601.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 16.483 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 2.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.121 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.006 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.579 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 335.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 8.523 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.117 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 1.351 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 267.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.218 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.150 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.138 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 136456.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 8.476 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.472 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.001 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.081 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 125730.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 60.845 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.016 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 77.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 162.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 158.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 348.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 312.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 81.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 67.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 18.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 56.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 45.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 86.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 84.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 98.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 93.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 86.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 25.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -9.10 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 17.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.20 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 19.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.70 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.08

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 95 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.71 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 5.40 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $420,068,020 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $91,084,783 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $607,617,466 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 14.5% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $370,218,228 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $459,442,126 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-49,849,792 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 14.9% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.5% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 3100 N TENAYA WAY — Address
General Information City/Town LAS VEGAS — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 2 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 5 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 11 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish CLARK — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 290039 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MOUNTAINVIEW HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NV — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (702) 255-5000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 89128 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.18 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.11 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.58 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.52 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.50 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.32 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.08 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.10 0.9995 p93 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.5% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 257 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 46 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 16.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 1.0000 p84 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 12.8% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 105 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 17 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 14.0% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 0.9969 p84 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 16.0% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 177 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 33 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 16.8% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9983 p16 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.4% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 801 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 150 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 19.3% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.83 0.9916 p10 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 4.4% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 3.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9955 p74 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 18.0% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 951 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 180 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 18.7% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 12.92 5.00 p90 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 5.75 8.75 p25 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 13.75 10.00 p73 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 32.42 29.50 p61 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →