Hospital

MAYO CLINIC HOSPITAL ROCHESTER

CCN: 240010 · ROCHESTER, MN 55902 · OLMSTED County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
1216 SECOND STREET SOUTHWEST, ROCHESTER, MN 55902
Phone
(507) 255-5123
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit (Church)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
5 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
6
2
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
4
7
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

✓ This hospital does not have excess readmissions triggering HRRP penalties.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 715 discharges
0.7890 p0
Heart Failure 1,466 discharges
0.8554 p1
Pneumonia 851 discharges
0.9002 p4
COPD 268 discharges
0.9794 p33
Hip/Knee Replacement 350 discharges
0.8812 p19
CABG Surgery 353 discharges
0.9507 p30
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

57.1 p97
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
24.2 p99
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
4.2 p9
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
21.3 p96
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
7.5 p67
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Not Penalized
Worst ERR: 0.9794
Value-Based Purchasing
57.1 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.2723

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 2.40 No Different Than the National Rate 370
Hybrid_HWM 2.30 Better Than the National Rate 6,332
MORT_30_AMI 8.40 Better Than the National Rate 643
MORT_30_CABG 1.60 No Different Than the National Rate 358
MORT_30_COPD 7.10 No Different Than the National Rate 244
MORT_30_HF 7.60 Better Than the National Rate 1,267
MORT_30_PN 11.00 Better Than the National Rate 821
MORT_30_STK 10.10 Better Than the National Rate 521
PSI_03 0.24 Better Than the National Rate 22,863
PSI_04 141.37 Better Than the National Rate 726
PSI_06 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 24,982
PSI_08 0.21 No Different Than the National Rate 28,469
PSI_09 3.63 Worse Than the National Rate 11,424
PSI_10 1.91 No Different Than the National Rate 9,136
PSI_11 5.26 Better Than the National Rate 8,646
PSI_12 4.19 No Different Than the National Rate 13,578
PSI_13 3.69 Better Than the National Rate 8,764
PSI_14 2.77 Worse Than the National Rate 3,855
PSI_15 0.75 No Different Than the National Rate 8,643
PSI_90 0.77 Better Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 84% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 2% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 5
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 90% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 83% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 2% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 15% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 79% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 3% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 18% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 84% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 13% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 91% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 84% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 3% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 13% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 65% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 15% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 20% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 4
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 79% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 6% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 51% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 24% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 25% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 9% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 91% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 5
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 9% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 91% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 8% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 92% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 76% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 6% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 18% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 69% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 4% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 27% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 4% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 11% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 85% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 5
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 2% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 88% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 10% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 5

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.340 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.654 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 70967.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 75.360 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 36.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.478 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.470 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.834 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 51753.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 74.276 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 47.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.633 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.497 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.020 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 1478.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 41.474 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 30.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.723 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.361 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.741 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 443.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 3.520 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.136 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.065 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.391 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 336503.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 28.328 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 5.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.177 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.529 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.703 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 318782.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 312.306 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 191.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.612 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 60.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 252.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 246.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 327.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 82.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 77.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 17.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 38.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 45.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 75.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 89.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -23.30 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -17.10 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -6.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 13.90 Better Than the National Rate
OP_32 14.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 10.80 Better Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 17.10 Better Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 14.50 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.95

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 98 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.32 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 4.69 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.86 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $2,727,990,609 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $1,235,225,561 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $3,701,160,210 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 32.5% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $3,189,845,256 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $2,954,112,332 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $461,854,649 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 33.1% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.1% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 1216 SECOND STREET SOUTHWEST — Address
General Information City/Town ROCHESTER — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 7 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 0 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 4 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 6 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 2 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish OLMSTED — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 240010 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MAYO CLINIC HOSPITAL ROCHESTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Church — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State MN — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (507) 255-5123 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 55902 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.65 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.60 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.47 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.37 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.70 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.27 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.95 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.79 0.9995 p0 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 715 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 68 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 11.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.95 1.0000 p30 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.8% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 353 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 35 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.3% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9969 p33 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 20.0% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 268 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 51 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.6% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.86 0.9983 p1 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 21.4% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,466 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 257 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.3% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.88 0.9916 p19 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.6% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 350 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 19 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.8% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 0.9955 p4 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.5% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 851 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 127 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 24.17 5.00 p99 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 7.50 2.50 p67 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 21.25 8.75 p96 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 4.17 10.00 p9 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 57.08 29.50 p97 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →