Hospital

PARKVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 150021 · FORT WAYNE, IN 46845 · ALLEN County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
11109 PARKVIEW PLAZA DRIVE, FORT WAYNE, IN 46845
Phone
(260) 266-1195
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
6
1
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 10 of 11 measures reported
1
7
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 516 discharges
0.9443 p17
Heart Failure 727 discharges
1.0275 p67
Pneumonia 796 discharges
0.8655 p1
COPD 247 discharges
1.0904 p96
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery 129 discharges
1.0355 p64
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

23.1 p27
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
4.5 p45
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
9.6 p45
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
9.0 p51
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0904
Value-Based Purchasing
23.1 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.2862

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small —
Hybrid_HWM 4.30 No Different Than the National Rate 3,022
MORT_30_AMI 12.80 No Different Than the National Rate 464
MORT_30_CABG 2.30 No Different Than the National Rate 129
MORT_30_COPD 8.80 No Different Than the National Rate 215
MORT_30_HF 15.90 Worse Than the National Rate 640
MORT_30_PN 15.90 No Different Than the National Rate 719
MORT_30_STK 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate 397
PSI_03 0.34 No Different Than the National Rate 11,748
PSI_04 190.66 No Different Than the National Rate 182
PSI_06 0.15 No Different Than the National Rate 13,792
PSI_08 0.24 No Different Than the National Rate 14,274
PSI_09 1.71 No Different Than the National Rate 3,103
PSI_10 1.15 No Different Than the National Rate 962
PSI_11 9.46 No Different Than the National Rate 915
PSI_12 3.30 No Different Than the National Rate 3,241
PSI_13 6.60 No Different Than the National Rate 922
PSI_14 1.96 No Different Than the National Rate 674
PSI_15 0.69 No Different Than the National Rate 3,267
PSI_90 0.90 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 76% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 21% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 24% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 69% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 27% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 74% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 21% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 23% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 68% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 26% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 52% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 23% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 25% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 70% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 11% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 19% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 33% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 35% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 32% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 9% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 91% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 5
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 8% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 92% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 11% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 89% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 75% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 5% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 20% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 62% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 8% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 30% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 5% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 18% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 77% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 79% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 18% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.478 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.088 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 28327.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 31.215 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 23.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.737 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.243 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.699 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 22386.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 32.795 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 14.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.427 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.182 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.936 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 530.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 13.331 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 6.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.450 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.508 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 5.436 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 176.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.502 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.997 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.158 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.955 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 230506.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 11.606 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 5.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.431 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.274 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.510 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 216740.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 105.779 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 40.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.378 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 89.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 160.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 159.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 186.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 71.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 96.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 56.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 11.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 63.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 78.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 80.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 91.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -3.40 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -1.40 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -22.70 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 14.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 14.00 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.30 Worse than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 19.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 13.80 Better Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.00

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 92 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.99 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.84 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $913,531,822 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $87,392,371 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,707,498,427 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -8.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,067,276,046 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,261,618,236 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $153,744,224 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 4.5% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.9% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 11109 PARKVIEW PLAZA DRIVE — Address
General Information City/Town FORT WAYNE — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 10 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 1 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish ALLEN — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 150021 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name PARKVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State IN — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (260) 266-1195 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 46845 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.40 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.33 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.70 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.45 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.68 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.29 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.00 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9995 p17 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 11.5% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 516 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 53 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 10.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 1.0000 p64 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 9.8% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 129 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 14 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.2% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 0.9969 p96 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.0% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 247 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 55 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9983 p67 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.9% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 727 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 151 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.5% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.87 0.9955 p1 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 796 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 99 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 13.6% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 4.50 5.00 p45 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 9.00 8.75 p51 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 9.58 10.00 p45 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 23.08 29.50 p27 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →