Hospital

THE QUEENS MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 120001 · HONOLULU, HI 96813 · HONOLULU County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
1301 PUNCHBOWL ST, HONOLULU, HI 96813
Phone
(808) 538-9011
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
3
4
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
1
9
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 257 discharges
1.0051 p53
Heart Failure 656 discharges
0.9275 p10
Pneumonia 695 discharges
1.0503 p79
COPD 134 discharges
0.9646 p20
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.1374 p82
CABG Surgery 101 discharges
1.0205 p57
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

31.6 p58
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.9 p71
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
4.2 p9
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
12.0 p71
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
7.5 p67
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1374
Value-Based Purchasing
31.6 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.8684

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate 113
Hybrid_HWM 3.20 Better Than the National Rate 2,877
MORT_30_AMI 12.10 No Different Than the National Rate 248
MORT_30_CABG 2.00 No Different Than the National Rate 102
MORT_30_COPD 7.40 No Different Than the National Rate 121
MORT_30_HF 10.20 No Different Than the National Rate 585
MORT_30_PN 16.80 No Different Than the National Rate 711
MORT_30_STK 12.30 No Different Than the National Rate 579
PSI_03 1.79 Worse Than the National Rate 10,444
PSI_04 181.61 No Different Than the National Rate 200
PSI_06 0.47 Worse Than the National Rate 11,638
PSI_08 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 12,099
PSI_09 2.90 No Different Than the National Rate 3,175
PSI_10 1.17 No Different Than the National Rate 1,411
PSI_11 7.07 No Different Than the National Rate 1,400
PSI_12 5.32 Worse Than the National Rate 3,569
PSI_13 4.22 No Different Than the National Rate 1,481
PSI_14 1.45 No Different Than the National Rate 821
PSI_15 0.95 No Different Than the National Rate 2,583
PSI_90 1.34 Worse Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 80% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 16% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 78% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 76% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 18% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 80% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 16% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 76% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 18% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 64% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 17% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 77% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 8% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 51% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 26% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 23% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 13% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 87% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 13% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 87% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 13% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 87% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 75% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 6% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 19% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 53% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 15% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 32% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 7% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 17% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 76% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 77% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 20% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.267 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.770 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 28996.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 29.794 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 14.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.470 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.443 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.007 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 21895.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 33.735 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 23.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.682 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 1.154 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.203 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 285.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 7.552 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 15.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.986 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.513 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 142.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.192 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.282 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.154 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 215551.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 13.168 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 8.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.608 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.322 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.541 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 211979.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 135.490 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 57.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.421 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 52.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 168.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 167.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 187.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 50.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 99.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 10.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 70.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 75.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 73.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 87.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 89.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 74.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 87.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 8.70 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -6.10 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 12.90 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 11.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 6.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.90 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.93

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.23 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.35 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.18 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,810,831,502 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $249,201,002 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,531,739,613 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 0.7% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $3,307,679,246 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,212,704,977 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $1,496,847,744 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 14.1% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.0% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 1301 PUNCHBOWL ST — Address
General Information City/Town HONOLULU — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish HONOLULU — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 120001 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name THE QUEENS MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State HI — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (808) 538-9011 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 96813 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.57 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.46 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.77 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.62 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 2.14 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.87 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.93 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9995 p53 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 257 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 37 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.3% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 1.0000 p57 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.2% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 101 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 11 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.4% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.96 0.9969 p20 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 15.9% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 134 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 18 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 15.4% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 0.9983 p10 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.8% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 656 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 115 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.4% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.14 0.9916 p82 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 4.8% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.5% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 0.9955 p79 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.0% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 695 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 113 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.92 5.00 p71 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 7.50 2.50 p67 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 12.00 8.75 p71 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 4.17 10.00 p9 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 31.58 29.50 p58 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →