Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
6000 49TH ST N, SAINT PETERSBURG, FL 33709
Phone
(727) 521-5121
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
1 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 6 of 8 measures reported
2
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
8
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 8 of 12 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 93 discharges
1.0686 p86
Heart Failure 239 discharges
1.0985 p92
Pneumonia 254 discharges
1.1562 p98
COPD 127 discharges
1.1610 p99
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.2092 p90
CABG Surgery
1.1224 p90
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

22.0 p23
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
8.8 p75
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
10.5 p52
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
2.8 p3
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.2092
Value-Based Purchasing
22.0 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.3200

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.90 No Different Than the National Rate 45
Hybrid_HWM 3.70 No Different Than the National Rate 763
MORT_30_AMI 11.90 No Different Than the National Rate 82
MORT_30_CABG 3.20 No Different Than the National Rate 31
MORT_30_COPD 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate 107
MORT_30_HF 9.10 No Different Than the National Rate 198
MORT_30_PN 12.70 Better Than the National Rate 239
MORT_30_STK 11.10 No Different Than the National Rate 140
PSI_03 0.81 No Different Than the National Rate 3,501
PSI_04 171.80 No Different Than the National Rate 50
PSI_06 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 4,241
PSI_08 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate 4,457
PSI_09 2.49 No Different Than the National Rate 713
PSI_10 1.51 No Different Than the National Rate 202
PSI_11 13.44 No Different Than the National Rate 217
PSI_12 2.89 No Different Than the National Rate 749
PSI_13 5.48 No Different Than the National Rate 214
PSI_14 1.72 No Different Than the National Rate 91
PSI_15 0.93 No Different Than the National Rate 677
PSI_90 1.13 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 72%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 9%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 19%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 7%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 68%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 11%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 21%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 68%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 21%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 68%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 11%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 21%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 75%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 10%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 65%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 12%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 23%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 64%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 12%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 24%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 51%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 28%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 21%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 63%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 15%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 22%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 39%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 42%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 19%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 21%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 79%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 20%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 80%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 21%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 79%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 60%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 17%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 23%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 48%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 18%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 34%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 18%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 25%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 57%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 14%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 52%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 34%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.207 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.571 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 5719.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 6.140 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.651 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.068 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.723 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 5989.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 11.299 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 3.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.266 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.330 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 6.504 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 41.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 1.016 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.969 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC
HAI_4_ELIGCASES
HAI_4_NUMERATOR
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.500 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 3.027 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 52256.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 3.661 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.366 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.060 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.365 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 52256.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 30.362 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 5.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.165 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV medium Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 31.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 158.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 153.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 230.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 58.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 25.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 78.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 78.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 98.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 87.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 99.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 92.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 94.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 9.50 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 34.20 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 63.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.70 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.00 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 21.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 18.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.05

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 93 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 0.50 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 2.87 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $172,689,885 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $26,421,890 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $185,118,317 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 13.7% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $55,194,585 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $154,833,450 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-117,495,300 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 14.2% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 7.0% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 6000 49TH ST N Address
General Information City/Town SAINT PETERSBURG City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 6 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 8 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish PINELLAS County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100238 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name HCA FLORIDA NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (727) 521-5121 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 33709 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.27 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.16 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.58 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.86 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 2.52 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.32 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.05 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 0.9995 p86 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.6% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 93 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 18 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.7% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.12 1.0000 p90 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 12.1% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 13.6% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.16 0.9969 p99 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 20.6% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 127 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 42 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 23.9% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.10 0.9983 p92 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.9% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 239 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 62 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 23.0% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.21 0.9916 p90 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.0% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 7.2% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.16 0.9955 p98 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.7% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 254 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 62 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 20.4% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 8.75 5.00 p75 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 2.75 8.75 p3 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 10.50 10.00 p52 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 22.00 29.50 p23 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →