Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
800 PRUDENTIAL DR, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207
Phone
(904) 202-2000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
4 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
3
4
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
2
6
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
1
9
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 644 discharges
1.1462 p97
Heart Failure 1,504 discharges
0.9334 p12
Pneumonia 1,505 discharges
0.9777 p37
COPD 417 discharges
0.9913 p44
Hip/Knee Replacement 166 discharges
1.1825 p87
CABG Surgery 334 discharges
1.0319 p63
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

24.4 p32
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.1 p66
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
8.3 p35
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
9.0 p51
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1825
Value-Based Purchasing
24.4 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.2499

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate 175
Hybrid_HWM 3.10 Better Than the National Rate 6,443
MORT_30_AMI 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate 545
MORT_30_CABG 2.80 No Different Than the National Rate 340
MORT_30_COPD 7.70 No Different Than the National Rate 372
MORT_30_HF 10.40 No Different Than the National Rate 1,279
MORT_30_PN 14.80 No Different Than the National Rate 1,398
MORT_30_STK 10.40 Better Than the National Rate 958
PSI_03 0.62 No Different Than the National Rate 20,501
PSI_04 165.29 No Different Than the National Rate 288
PSI_06 0.16 No Different Than the National Rate 24,698
PSI_08 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 25,402
PSI_09 1.88 No Different Than the National Rate 6,107
PSI_10 2.49 No Different Than the National Rate 2,989
PSI_11 14.18 Worse Than the National Rate 2,854
PSI_12 4.41 No Different Than the National Rate 6,567
PSI_13 5.66 No Different Than the National Rate 2,929
PSI_14 1.59 No Different Than the National Rate 1,490
PSI_15 0.56 No Different Than the National Rate 5,191
PSI_90 1.17 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 78%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 17%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 76%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 19%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 72%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 75%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 73%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 20%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 70%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 22%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 58%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 21%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 21%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 75%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 10%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 41%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 32%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 27%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 15%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 85%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 17%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 83%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 13%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 87%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 78%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 7%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 15%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 63%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 7%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 30%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 7%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 17%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 76%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 76%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 21%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.363 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.921 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 27421.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 30.294 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 18.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.594 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.137 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.702 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 14596.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 17.788 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 6.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.337 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.081 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.617 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 584.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 15.645 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 4.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.256 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.589 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 3.022 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 460.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 4.129 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 6.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 1.453 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 1.007 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.150 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 379484.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 18.023 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 27.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.498 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.137 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.246 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 335927.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 242.972 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 45.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.185 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 94.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 171.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 167.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 279.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 2.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 64.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 93.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 52.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 54.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 76.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 81.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 73.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 22.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -7.10 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 9.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.00 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 11.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 15.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 15.60 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.98

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 98 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.17 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.07 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.22 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $2,559,107,000 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $373,200,000 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $2,076,866,000 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 7.3% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $4,120,477,000 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,690,029,848 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $1,561,370,000 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 16.3% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.4% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 800 PRUDENTIAL DR Address
General Information City/Town JACKSONVILLE City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 3 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish DUVAL County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100088 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name BAPTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER - JACKSONVILLE Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (904) 202-2000 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 32207 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.60 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.17 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.77 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 1.28 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.45 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.25 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.98 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.15 0.9995 p97 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.3% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 644 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 105 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.2% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 1.0000 p63 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.8% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 334 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 38 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 11.1% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9969 p44 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.5% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 417 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 80 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.3% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 0.9983 p12 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.0% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,504 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 276 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.7% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.18 0.9916 p87 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.1% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 166 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 14 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 7.3% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9955 p37 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.3% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 1,505 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 239 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.0% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.08 5.00 p66 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 9.00 8.75 p51 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 8.33 10.00 p35 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 24.42 29.50 p32 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →