Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
5301 S CONGRESS AVE, ATLANTIS, FL 33462
Phone
(561) 965-7300
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
2 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p7
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
6
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 8 of 12 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 292 discharges
1.0617 p83
Heart Failure 760 discharges
1.0478 p77
Pneumonia 774 discharges
1.0304 p70
COPD 162 discharges
0.9822 p36
Hip/Knee Replacement 189 discharges
1.1472 p84
CABG Surgery 96 discharges
1.1898 p96
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

29.6 p50
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
10.4 p83
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
14.2 p75
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
5.0 p19
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1898
Value-Based Purchasing
29.6 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.1163

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.30 No Different Than the National Rate 225
Hybrid_HWM 3.90 No Different Than the National Rate 2,746
MORT_30_AMI 10.80 No Different Than the National Rate 267
MORT_30_CABG 2.50 No Different Than the National Rate 99
MORT_30_COPD 6.90 No Different Than the National Rate 146
MORT_30_HF 9.80 No Different Than the National Rate 630
MORT_30_PN 15.30 No Different Than the National Rate 729
MORT_30_STK 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate 323
PSI_03 0.44 No Different Than the National Rate 9,625
PSI_04 120.61 Better Than the National Rate 150
PSI_06 0.11 No Different Than the National Rate 11,995
PSI_08 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 12,327
PSI_09 1.57 No Different Than the National Rate 2,503
PSI_10 1.13 No Different Than the National Rate 908
PSI_11 19.51 Worse Than the National Rate 1,000
PSI_12 3.16 No Different Than the National Rate 2,555
PSI_13 5.65 No Different Than the National Rate 950
PSI_14 1.88 No Different Than the National Rate 505
PSI_15 0.80 No Different Than the National Rate 1,632
PSI_90 1.15 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 66%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 11%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 23%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 1
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 74%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 7%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 19%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 62%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 12%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 26%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 64%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 14%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 22%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 69%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 10%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 21%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 76%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 18%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 67%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 11%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 22%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 64%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 14%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 22%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 51%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 32%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 17%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 64%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 18%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 37%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 46%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 17%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 23%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 77%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 1
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 24%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 76%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 22%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 78%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 63%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 16%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 21%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 49%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 18%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 33%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 16%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 25%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 59%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 13%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 59%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 28%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.224 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.358 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 7644.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 8.162 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.613 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.004 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.373 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 8170.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 13.232 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.076 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.198 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.506 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 249.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 6.406 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.624 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.542 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 5.803 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 170.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.407 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 2.132 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.698 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.191 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 138834.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 9.310 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 12.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.289 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.035 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.158 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 138834.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 87.702 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 7.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.080 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 32.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 145.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 141.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 276.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 88.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 20.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 98.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 97.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 87.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 96.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 93.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 29.10 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 6.40 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 15.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.10 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.50 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.00

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 97 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.29 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 3.33 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $712,904,143 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $127,071,045 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $783,595,205 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 15.7% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $551,135,191 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $559,062,417 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-161,768,952 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 16.1% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 8.7% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 5301 S CONGRESS AVE Address
General Information City/Town ATLANTIS City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 8 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 6 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish PALM BEACH County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100080 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name HCA FLORIDA JFK HOSPITAL Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 2 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (561) 965-7300 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 33462 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.10 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.10 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.68 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.96 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.65 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.12 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.00 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9995 p83 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.5% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 292 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 48 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.4% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.19 1.0000 p96 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.7% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 96 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 18 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 13.9% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9969 p36 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.5% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 162 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 28 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.1% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 0.9983 p77 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.8% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 760 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 161 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.7% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.15 0.9916 p84 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.6% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 189 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 16 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 7.6% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9955 p70 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.3% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 774 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 132 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.8% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 10.42 5.00 p83 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 5.00 8.75 p19 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 14.17 10.00 p75 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 29.58 29.50 p50 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →