Hospital

FAMILY HEALTH WEST HOSPITAL

CCN: 061302 · FRUITA, CO 81521 · MESA County

Overview

Address
300 W OTTLEY AVE, FRUITA, CO 81521
Phone
(970) 858-9871
Hospital Type
Critical Access (CAH)
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
—
Star rating not available
Critical Access (CAH) — Small rural hospital (≤25 inpatient beds) at least 35 miles from the nearest hospital. Reimbursed at 101% of cost rather than standard DRG rates. Exempt from most CMS payment adjustment programs.

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Safety of Care 1 of 8 measures reported
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 1 of 11 measures reported
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Timely & Effective Care 5 of 12 measures reported
5 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small —
Hybrid_HWM 4.20 No Different Than the National Rate 31
MORT_30_AMI — — —
MORT_30_CABG — — —
MORT_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_HF — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_PN 14.50 No Different Than the National Rate 27
MORT_30_STK — — —
PSI_03 — — —
PSI_04 — — —
PSI_06 — — —
PSI_08 — — —
PSI_09 — — —
PSI_10 — — —
PSI_11 — — —
PSI_12 — — —
PSI_13 — — —
PSI_14 — — —
PSI_15 — — —
PSI_90 — — —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 82% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 92% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 9% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 12% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 75% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 2% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 23% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 82% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 12% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 91% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 80% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 13% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 74% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 10% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 16% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 67% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 18% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 15% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — —
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 79% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 16% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 5% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 54% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 20% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 26% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 8% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 92% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — —
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 3% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 97% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 13% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 87% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 84% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 1% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 15% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — —
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 55% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 12% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 33% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — —
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 6% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 17% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 77% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — —
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 1% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 89% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 10% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — —
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — —

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER — —
HAI_1_CIUPPER — —
HAI_1_DOPC — —
HAI_1_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_1_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_1_SIR — —
HAI_2_CILOWER — —
HAI_2_CIUPPER — —
HAI_2_DOPC — —
HAI_2_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_2_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_2_SIR — —
HAI_3_CILOWER — —
HAI_3_CIUPPER — —
HAI_3_DOPC — —
HAI_3_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_3_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_3_SIR — —
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC — —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER — —
HAI_5_CIUPPER — —
HAI_5_DOPC 7428.000 —
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 0.155 —
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_5_SIR — —
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.465 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 4.975 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 7428.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 1.641 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 1.828 No Different than National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV — Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 4.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 2.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 99.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 134.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 133.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 197.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 — Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 — Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 28.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 — Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR — Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR — Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 79.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI — —
EDAC_30_HF — Number of Cases Too Small
EDAC_30_PN -27.20 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ADM — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 — Number of cases too small
READM_30_AMI — —
READM_30_CABG — —
READM_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_HF — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 15.60 No Different Than the National Rate

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 51 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.40 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 3.30 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 13.75 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $18,881,279 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $6,027,090 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $77,735,914 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -3.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $72,854,632 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $55,056,689 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $53,973,353 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 7.0% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.2% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 300 W OTTLEY AVE — Address
General Information City/Town FRUITA — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures Not Available — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures Not Available — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 1 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 1 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 5 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better Not Available — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different Not Available — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse Not Available — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 1 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 0 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 1 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MESA — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 061302 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name FAMILY HEALTH WEST HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating Not Available — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote 16 — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Critical Access Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote 5 — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote 5 — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State CO — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (970) 858-9871 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 81521 — ZIP Code
Methodology

Full methodology →