Hospital

HUNTINGTON BEACH HOSPITAL

CCN: 050526 · HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 · ORANGE County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
17772 BEACH BLVD, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
Phone
(714) 843-5000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
—
Star rating not available
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 2 of 7 measures reported
2
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 2 of 8 measures reported
2
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 3 of 11 measures reported
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 7 of 12 measures reported
7 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack)
— Not reported
Heart Failure 79 discharges
1.1140 p96
Pneumonia 163 discharges
1.0158 p62
COPD
— Not reported
Hip/Knee Replacement 0 discharges
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

10.7 p1
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.5 p67
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
1.7 p2
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
1.5 p1
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1140
Value-Based Purchasing
10.7 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 1.2956

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — — —
Hybrid_HWM 4.00 No Different Than the National Rate 276
MORT_30_AMI — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_CABG — — —
MORT_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_HF 9.90 No Different Than the National Rate 73
MORT_30_PN 13.50 No Different Than the National Rate 161
MORT_30_STK — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_03 0.33 No Different Than the National Rate 988
PSI_04 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_06 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 1,296
PSI_08 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate 1,270
PSI_09 2.32 No Different Than the National Rate 60
PSI_10 — — —
PSI_11 — — —
PSI_12 3.35 No Different Than the National Rate 70
PSI_13 — — —
PSI_14 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_15 1.05 No Different Than the National Rate 100
PSI_90 0.90 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 62% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 13% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 25% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 1
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 67% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 25% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 57% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 16% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 27% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 61% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 15% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 61% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 16% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 23% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 67% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 20% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 62% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 14% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 24% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 54% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 22% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 43% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 34% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 23% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 57% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 21% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 22% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 30% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 46% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 24% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 28% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 72% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 1
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 33% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 67% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 22% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 78% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 59% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 20% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 21% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 1
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 29% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 34% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 37% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 1
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 22% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 31% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 47% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 21% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 50% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 29% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 1

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER — —
HAI_1_CIUPPER — —
HAI_1_DOPC 1183.000 —
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 0.793 —
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 1.000 —
HAI_1_SIR — —
HAI_2_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 2.649 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 1887.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 1.131 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER — —
HAI_3_CIUPPER — —
HAI_3_DOPC 7.000 —
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 0.188 —
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_3_SIR — —
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC — —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER — —
HAI_5_CIUPPER — —
HAI_5_DOPC 11588.000 —
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 0.540 —
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_5_SIR — —
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.565 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 2.128 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 11588.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 7.763 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 9.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 1.159 No Different than National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV low Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 12.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 86.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 181.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 171.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 288.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 7.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 — Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 17.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 59.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 75.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 96.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 77.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 89.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI — Number of Cases Too Small
EDAC_30_HF 48.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 22.20 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 — —
OP_35_ADM — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 — —
READM_30_AMI — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_CABG — —
READM_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_HF 21.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — —
READM_30_PN 16.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.25

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 77 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 3.38 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 2.82 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $64,953,602 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-9,141,123 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $59,646,850 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -16.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $73,301,857 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $60,003,667 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $8,348,255 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -15.2% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.5% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 17772 BEACH BLVD — Address
General Information City/Town HUNTINGTON BEACH — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 2 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 3 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 2 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 7 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 2 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 3 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 0 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 2 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish ORANGE — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 050526 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name HUNTINGTON BEACH HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating Not Available — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote 16 — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State CA — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (714) 843-5000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 92647 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 1.51 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.89 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 3.87 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.94 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 1.30 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.25 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.11 0.9983 p96 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.4% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 79 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 25 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 0 — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9955 p62 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 18.7% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 163 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 32 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 19.0% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.50 5.00 p67 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 1.50 8.75 p1 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 1.67 10.00 p2 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 10.67 29.50 p1 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →