Hospital

OAK VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT

CCN: 050067 · OAKDALE, CA 95361 · STANISLAUS County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
350 S OAK AVE, OAKDALE, CA 95361
Phone
(209) 847-3011
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Government (District)
Emergency Services
Yes
—
Star rating not available
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 2 of 7 measures reported
2
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 1 of 8 measures reported
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 4 of 11 measures reported
4
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Timely & Effective Care 7 of 12 measures reported
7 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack)
— Not reported
Heart Failure
1.0551 p81
Pneumonia
1.0033 p55
COPD
— Not reported
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0551
Value-Based Purchasing
—
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 1.0591

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small —
Hybrid_HWM 4.40 No Different Than the National Rate 91
MORT_30_AMI — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_CABG — — —
MORT_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_HF 11.00 No Different Than the National Rate 25
MORT_30_PN 18.90 No Different Than the National Rate 39
MORT_30_STK — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_03 0.58 No Different Than the National Rate 243
PSI_04 — — —
PSI_06 0.21 No Different Than the National Rate 387
PSI_08 0.27 No Different Than the National Rate 391
PSI_09 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_10 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_11 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_12 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_13 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_14 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_15 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_90 0.98 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 83% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 13% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 82% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 11% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 81% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 13% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 78% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 18% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 78% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 14% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 69% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 16% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 15% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — —
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 73% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 12% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 65% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 19% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 16% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 8% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 92% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — —
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 11% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 89% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 6% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 94% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 87% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 4% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 9% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — —
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 64% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 12% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 24% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — —
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 3% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 33% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 64% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — —
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 8% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 70% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 22% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — —
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — —

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER — —
HAI_1_CIUPPER — —
HAI_1_DOPC 301.000 —
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 0.175 —
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 1.000 —
HAI_1_SIR — —
HAI_2_CILOWER — —
HAI_2_CIUPPER — —
HAI_2_DOPC 286.000 —
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 0.141 —
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 1.000 —
HAI_2_SIR — —
HAI_3_CILOWER — —
HAI_3_CIUPPER — —
HAI_3_DOPC 1.000 —
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 0.024 —
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_3_SIR — —
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC — —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES — —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR — —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER — —
HAI_5_CIUPPER — —
HAI_5_DOPC 2481.000 —
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 0.063 —
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_5_SIR — —
HAI_6_CILOWER — —
HAI_6_CIUPPER — —
HAI_6_DOPC 2481.000 —
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 0.615 —
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 1.000 —
HAI_6_SIR — —

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV medium Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 3.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 71.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 127.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 125.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c — Emergency Department
OP_18d 292.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 — Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 13.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR — Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 91.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI — Number of Cases Too Small
EDAC_30_HF 94.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 59.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM — —
OP_35_ED — —
OP_36 — Number of cases too small
READM_30_AMI — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_CABG — —
READM_30_COPD — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_HF 20.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 16.00 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.83

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 66 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.32 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.99 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.35 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $37,318,822 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $10,060,767 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $77,162,372 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Occupancy Rate (%) 1.1% — metrics.occupancy_rate
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -7.9% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $122,773,065 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $74,468,937 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $85,454,243 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 10.8% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.1% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 350 S OAK AVE — Address
General Information City/Town OAKDALE — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 2 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures Not Available — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 4 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 1 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 7 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 2 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 4 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 0 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 1 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish STANISLAUS — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 050067 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name OAK VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating Not Available — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote 16 — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Government - Hospital District or Authority — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote 5 — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State CA — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (209) 847-3011 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 95361 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 1.28 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 1.06 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.83 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9983 p81 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 15.3% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 16.1% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9955 p55 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 12.3% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 12.3% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Methodology

Full methodology →