Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
327 MEDICAL PARK DRIVE, BRIDGEPORT, WV 26330
Phone
(681) 342-1000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
4 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 6 of 7 measures reported
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 10 of 11 measures reported
1
7
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 291 discharges
1.0116 p57
Heart Failure 446 discharges
1.0416 p75
Pneumonia 524 discharges
1.0980 p91
COPD 194 discharges
0.9693 p23
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.8469 p12
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

23.5 p28
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
8.5 p74
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
5.0 p12
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
5.0 p19
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
5.0 p56
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0980
Value-Based Purchasing
23.5 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.2463

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.10 No Different Than the National Rate 53
Hybrid_HWM 4.20 No Different Than the National Rate 1,273
MORT_30_AMI 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate 329
MORT_30_CABG
MORT_30_COPD 6.90 No Different Than the National Rate 171
MORT_30_HF 11.00 No Different Than the National Rate 397
MORT_30_PN 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate 486
MORT_30_STK 14.50 No Different Than the National Rate 120
PSI_03 0.18 No Different Than the National Rate 5,577
PSI_04 147.02 No Different Than the National Rate 59
PSI_06 0.21 No Different Than the National Rate 6,356
PSI_08 0.29 No Different Than the National Rate 6,437
PSI_09 2.04 No Different Than the National Rate 1,431
PSI_10 1.51 No Different Than the National Rate 516
PSI_11 6.58 No Different Than the National Rate 499
PSI_12 3.79 No Different Than the National Rate 1,463
PSI_13 4.75 No Different Than the National Rate 483
PSI_14 1.93 No Different Than the National Rate 308
PSI_15 1.28 No Different Than the National Rate 1,287
PSI_90 0.79 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 79%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 17%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 77%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 18%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 74%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 78%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 74%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 20%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 74%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 19%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 62%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 20%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 77%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 11%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 12%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 48%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 29%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 23%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 17%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 83%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 17%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 83%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 16%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 84%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 67%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 12%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 21%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 57%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 9%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 34%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 9%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 21%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 70%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 6%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 68%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 26%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.138 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.046 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 10111.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 9.222 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.434 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.580 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.918 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 10298.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 9.967 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 11.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 1.104 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.497 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.006 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 134.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 3.687 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.356 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC 11.000
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.111
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.014 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.332 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 69220.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 3.703 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.270 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.212 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.667 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 69220.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 30.606 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 12.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.392 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 97.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 208.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 204.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 361.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 270.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 62.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 100.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 61.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 13.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 68.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 90.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 74.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 99.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 72.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 92.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 34.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 15.00 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 28.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.30 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.20 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 7.20 Better Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.30 Worse than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG
READM_30_COPD 17.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 20.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 17.60 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.97

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 91 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.24 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 4.77 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.52 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $904,858,000 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $105,450,000 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $551,708,927 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 2.6% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,151,896,000 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $399,076,805 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $247,038,000 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 16.4% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.0% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 327 MEDICAL PARK DRIVE Address
General Information City/Town BRIDGEPORT City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 6 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 10 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish HARRISON County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 510006 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name UNITED HOSPITAL CENTER, INC Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State WV State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (681) 342-1000 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 26330 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 1.02 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.39 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.66 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.32 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.49 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.25 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.97 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9995 p57 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.1% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 291 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 42 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.2% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9969 p23 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 20.4% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 194 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 36 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.8% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9983 p75 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 21.3% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 446 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 102 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 22.2% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.85 0.9916 p12 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.9% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.0% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.10 0.9955 p91 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.8% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 524 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 103 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 18.4% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 8.50 5.00 p74 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 5.00 2.50 p56 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 5.00 8.75 p19 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 5.00 10.00 p12 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 23.50 29.50 p28 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →