Hospital

JOHNSON CITY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 440063 · JOHNSON CITY, TN 37604 · WASHINGTON County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
400 N STATE OF FRANKLIN RD, JOHNSON CITY, TN 37604
Phone
(423) 431-6111
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
—
Star rating not available
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
1
5
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
9
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 376 discharges
1.0285 p68
Heart Failure 396 discharges
0.9660 p27
Pneumonia 403 discharges
0.8945 p3
COPD 105 discharges
0.9965 p49
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.0027 p52
CABG Surgery 101 discharges
1.2914 p99
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

9.4 p0
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
0.8 p13
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
5.8 p17
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
2.8 p3
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.2914
Value-Based Purchasing
9.4 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.7814

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.00 No Different Than the National Rate 82
Hybrid_HWM 4.00 No Different Than the National Rate 1,909
MORT_30_AMI 14.10 No Different Than the National Rate 317
MORT_30_CABG 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate 103
MORT_30_COPD 9.90 No Different Than the National Rate 99
MORT_30_HF 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate 327
MORT_30_PN 19.20 No Different Than the National Rate 391
MORT_30_STK 18.40 Worse Than the National Rate 330
PSI_03 0.97 No Different Than the National Rate 6,618
PSI_04 226.06 Worse Than the National Rate 120
PSI_06 0.23 No Different Than the National Rate 8,033
PSI_08 0.21 No Different Than the National Rate 8,071
PSI_09 1.63 No Different Than the National Rate 2,149
PSI_10 2.70 No Different Than the National Rate 769
PSI_11 11.21 No Different Than the National Rate 717
PSI_12 3.72 No Different Than the National Rate 2,212
PSI_13 7.03 No Different Than the National Rate 760
PSI_14 1.88 No Different Than the National Rate 304
PSI_15 0.82 No Different Than the National Rate 1,144
PSI_90 1.23 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 73% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 20% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 80% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 16% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 70% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 22% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 67% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 9% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 73% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 9% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 9% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 19% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 66% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 10% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 55% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 26% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 69% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 14% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 17% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 41% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 38% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 18% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 82% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 19% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 81% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 17% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 83% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 59% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 19% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 22% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 1
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 47% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 16% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 37% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 20% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 26% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 54% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 14% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 51% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 35% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.514 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.698 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 10010.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 11.257 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 11.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.977 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.200 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.903 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 10582.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 15.328 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 7.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.457 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.406 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.080 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 119.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 3.133 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.277 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 92.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.841 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 3.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.370 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.222 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 143688.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 15.640 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 11.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.703 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.237 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.548 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 128642.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 59.778 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 22.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.368 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 10.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 2.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 96.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 208.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 204.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 251.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 92.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 57.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 16.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 42.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 34.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 67.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 95.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 2.50 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -12.10 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -0.70 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.10 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 13.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.06

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 95 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.92 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 3.50 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $251,352,860 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-660,039 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $623,040,361 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -3.3% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $335,890,292 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $529,256,933 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $84,537,432 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -0.1% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.3% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 400 N STATE OF FRANKLIN RD — Address
General Information City/Town JOHNSON CITY — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures Not Available — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 2 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 5 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish WASHINGTON — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 440063 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name JOHNSON CITY MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating Not Available — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote 5 — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State TN — State
General Information TE Group Footnote 5 — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (423) 431-6111 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 37604 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.67 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.30 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.02 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.60 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 2.12 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.78 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.06 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9995 p68 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 376 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 51 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.2% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.29 1.0000 p99 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 9.5% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 101 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 19 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 12.3% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9969 p49 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.4% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 105 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 20 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.3% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9983 p27 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.0% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 396 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 74 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 19.3% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9916 p52 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.4% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.5% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.89 0.9955 p3 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.1% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 403 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 54 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.3% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 0.83 5.00 p13 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 2.75 8.75 p3 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 5.83 10.00 p17 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 9.42 29.50 p0 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →