Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
9330 MEDICAL PLAZA DR, CHARLESTON, SC 29406
Phone
(843) 847-4100
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
1
7
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
10
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 406 discharges
1.0445 p76
Heart Failure 766 discharges
1.0020 p52
Pneumonia 597 discharges
0.9813 p39
COPD 176 discharges
1.0892 p96
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.1687 p86
CABG Surgery 96 discharges
0.9793 p41
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

25.7 p36
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
10.0 p81
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
7.9 p32
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
7.8 p42
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1687
Value-Based Purchasing
25.7 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.0391

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.90 No Different Than the National Rate 92
Hybrid_HWM 4.60 No Different Than the National Rate 2,733
MORT_30_AMI 10.60 No Different Than the National Rate 379
MORT_30_CABG 2.10 No Different Than the National Rate 98
MORT_30_COPD 11.00 No Different Than the National Rate 169
MORT_30_HF 10.90 No Different Than the National Rate 657
MORT_30_PN 16.90 No Different Than the National Rate 563
MORT_30_STK 12.90 No Different Than the National Rate 436
PSI_03 0.09 Better Than the National Rate 8,192
PSI_04 174.05 No Different Than the National Rate 176
PSI_06 0.11 No Different Than the National Rate 10,616
PSI_08 0.25 No Different Than the National Rate 10,646
PSI_09 1.65 No Different Than the National Rate 2,781
PSI_10 1.25 No Different Than the National Rate 971
PSI_11 10.59 No Different Than the National Rate 867
PSI_12 2.96 No Different Than the National Rate 2,808
PSI_13 5.46 No Different Than the National Rate 998
PSI_14 1.80 No Different Than the National Rate 518
PSI_15 0.90 No Different Than the National Rate 1,958
PSI_90 0.81 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 77%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 17%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 84%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 75%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 19%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 72%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 77%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 17%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 84%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 74%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 20%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 73%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 19%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 61%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 22%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 17%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 76%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 10%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 14%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 47%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 34%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 19%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 15%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 85%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 17%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 83%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 14%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 86%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 73%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 11%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 16%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 52%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 16%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 32%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 11%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 22%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 67%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 9%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 65%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 26%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.385 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.573 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 9386.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 9.657 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 8.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.828 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.249 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.276 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 7513.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 9.777 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 6.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.614 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.233 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.408 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 286.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 7.870 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.635 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.132 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.611 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 309.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 2.531 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.790 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.170 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.288 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 117888.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 7.493 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.534 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.156 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.466 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 109066.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 46.467 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 13.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.280 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 60.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 128.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 126.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 418.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 0.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 75.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 96.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 48.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 86.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 88.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 97.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 97.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 90.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 89.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 32.00 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 18.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -3.00 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.00 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 19.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 15.70 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.01

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 95 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 4.08 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 4.98 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $788,909,835 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $120,323,067 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $685,856,380 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 16.1% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $670,795,305 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $479,991,130 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-118,114,530 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 17.3% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 9.7% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 9330 MEDICAL PLAZA DR Address
General Information City/Town CHARLESTON City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 10 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 7 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish CHARLESTON County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 420079 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State SC State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (843) 847-4100 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 29406 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.84 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.41 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.84 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.70 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.92 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.04 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.01 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9995 p76 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.9% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 406 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 61 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.5% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 1.0000 p41 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 12.3% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 96 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 11 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 12.0% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 0.9969 p96 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 16.6% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 176 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 38 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.0% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9983 p52 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.9% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 766 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 153 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.0% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.17 0.9916 p86 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.2% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 7.2% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9955 p39 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.7% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 597 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 91 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.5% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 10.00 5.00 p81 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 7.75 8.75 p42 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 7.92 10.00 p32 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 25.67 29.50 p36 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →