Hospital

FIRELANDS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 360025 · SANDUSKY, OH 44870 · ERIE County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
1111 HAYES AVENUE, SANDUSKY, OH 44870
Phone
(419) 557-7400
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 5 of 7 measures reported
5
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 10 of 11 measures reported
10
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 143 discharges
0.9733 p31
Heart Failure 359 discharges
1.0042 p53
Pneumonia 237 discharges
0.9539 p21
COPD 149 discharges
1.0271 p74
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

28.6 p47
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
1.3 p15
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
17.1 p87
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
10.3 p61
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0271
Value-Based Purchasing
28.6 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.1562

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small —
Hybrid_HWM 5.00 No Different Than the National Rate 1,044
MORT_30_AMI 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate 129
MORT_30_CABG — Number of Cases Too Small —
MORT_30_COPD 8.30 No Different Than the National Rate 133
MORT_30_HF 14.00 No Different Than the National Rate 303
MORT_30_PN 16.10 No Different Than the National Rate 226
MORT_30_STK 11.90 No Different Than the National Rate 131
PSI_03 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 2,877
PSI_04 — Number of Cases Too Small —
PSI_06 0.17 No Different Than the National Rate 4,309
PSI_08 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 4,225
PSI_09 2.26 No Different Than the National Rate 631
PSI_10 1.64 No Different Than the National Rate 138
PSI_11 10.38 No Different Than the National Rate 134
PSI_12 3.27 No Different Than the National Rate 650
PSI_13 4.94 No Different Than the National Rate 129
PSI_14 1.70 No Different Than the National Rate 118
PSI_15 0.97 No Different Than the National Rate 469
PSI_90 0.89 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 82% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 89% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 8% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 81% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 15% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 19% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 80% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 16% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 11% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 78% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 17% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 75% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 20% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 56% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 22% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 22% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 67% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 10% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 23% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 44% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 34% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 22% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 10% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 90% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 10% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 90% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 11% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 89% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 80% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 6% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 14% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 57% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 8% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 35% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 7% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 19% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 74% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 5% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 69% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 26% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.346 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 2477.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 2.226 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.087 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.716 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 4160.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 3.851 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.519 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.029 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 2.886 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 63.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 1.709 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.585 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 28.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.205 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.568 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 39401.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 1.910 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.300 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.862 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 38103.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 26.592 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 14.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.526 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 95.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 176.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 170.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 324.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 86.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 95.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 10.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 74.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 76.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 88.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 92.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 52.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 96.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -6.80 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -1.60 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -0.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.00 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 14.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 6.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.20 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_COPD 18.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 15.50 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.03

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 88 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.32 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.53 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 9.30 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $285,425,601 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $32,771,259 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $244,998,572 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -10.7% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $521,579,310 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $217,904,089 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $236,153,709 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 10.7% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.5% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 1111 HAYES AVENUE — Address
General Information City/Town SANDUSKY — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 5 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 10 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 5 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 10 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish ERIE — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 360025 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name FIRELANDS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State OH — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (419) 557-7400 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 44870 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.87 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.58 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.54 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.82 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.16 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.03 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9995 p31 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 11.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 143 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 14 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 10.7% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9969 p74 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 15.7% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 149 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 26 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 16.2% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9983 p53 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 17.7% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 359 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 64 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 17.7% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.95 0.9955 p21 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 14.6% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 237 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 30 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 14.0% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 1.25 5.00 p15 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 10.25 8.75 p61 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 17.08 10.00 p87 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 28.58 29.50 p47 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →