Hospital

SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER FARGO

CCN: 350011 · FARGO, ND 58122 · CASS County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
801 BROADWAY NORTH, FARGO, ND 58122
Phone
(701) 234-2000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
4 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p63
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
3
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
3
7
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 511 discharges
0.9027 p5
Heart Failure 799 discharges
0.9142 p7
Pneumonia 523 discharges
0.8422 p0
COPD 224 discharges
0.9809 p35
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.7789 p5
CABG Surgery 224 discharges
1.0102 p54
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

31.2 p56
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
14.6 p93
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
12.1 p62
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
4.5 p15
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0102
Value-Based Purchasing
31.2 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.3139

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.20 No Different Than the National Rate 314
Hybrid_HWM 3.70 No Different Than the National Rate 2,823
MORT_30_AMI 11.20 No Different Than the National Rate 490
MORT_30_CABG 1.80 No Different Than the National Rate 227
MORT_30_COPD 8.90 No Different Than the National Rate 209
MORT_30_HF 9.60 No Different Than the National Rate 710
MORT_30_PN 11.40 Better Than the National Rate 513
MORT_30_STK 13.00 No Different Than the National Rate 449
PSI_03 0.90 No Different Than the National Rate 9,956
PSI_04 187.76 No Different Than the National Rate 208
PSI_06 0.20 No Different Than the National Rate 11,914
PSI_08 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate 12,264
PSI_09 3.26 No Different Than the National Rate 3,592
PSI_10 2.32 No Different Than the National Rate 1,472
PSI_11 6.29 No Different Than the National Rate 1,450
PSI_12 3.26 No Different Than the National Rate 3,841
PSI_13 5.89 No Different Than the National Rate 1,436
PSI_14 1.79 No Different Than the National Rate 841
PSI_15 1.96 Worse Than the National Rate 2,599
PSI_90 1.07 No Different Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 72% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 78% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 19% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 72% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 22% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 67% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 26% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 75% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 76% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 16% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 67% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 25% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 53% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 22% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 25% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 68% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 11% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 21% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 38% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 34% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 28% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 14% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 86% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 14% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 86% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 14% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 86% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 61% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 14% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 25% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 62% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 7% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 31% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 8% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 25% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 67% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 5% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 71% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 24% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.048 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.509 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 14423.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 16.034 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 3.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.187 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER N/A Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.336 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 7666.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 8.908 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.406 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.659 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 339.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 9.155 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 8.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.874 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 34.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.319 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.135 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.023 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 145459.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 9.432 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.424 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.118 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.370 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 131049.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 55.176 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 12.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.217 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 91.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 197.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 192.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 318.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 2.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 50.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 97.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 14.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 44.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 46.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 71.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 100.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 73.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 92.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -16.00 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -20.20 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN -28.10 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 12.30 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 12.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.04

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.31 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 7.36 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 12.53 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $892,415,813 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $157,764,796 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,585,070,733 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -11.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $931,802,916 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,052,772,873 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $39,387,103 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 8.2% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.6% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 801 BROADWAY NORTH — Address
General Information City/Town FARGO — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 3 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish CASS — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 350011 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER FARGO — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 4 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State ND — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (701) 234-2000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 58122 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.08 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.32 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.33 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.43 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.88 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.31 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.04 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 0.9995 p5 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.0% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 511 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 55 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 11.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 1.0000 p54 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 224 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 23 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.2% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9969 p35 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.8% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 224 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 42 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.4% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.91 0.9983 p7 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 799 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 144 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.8% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.78 0.9916 p5 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 6.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.7% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.84 0.9955 p0 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.4% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 523 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 61 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 13.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 14.58 5.00 p93 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 4.50 8.75 p15 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 12.08 10.00 p62 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 31.17 29.50 p56 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →