Hospital

ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL

CCN: 330125 · ROCHESTER, NY 14621 · MONROE County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
1425 PORTLAND AVENUE, ROCHESTER, NY 14621
Phone
(585) 922-4000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
1 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
2
5
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
9
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 196 discharges
1.0339 p70
Heart Failure 423 discharges
1.0734 p86
Pneumonia 193 discharges
1.1211 p95
COPD 90 discharges
1.0895 p96
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.0540 p67
CABG Surgery 91 discharges
0.9993 p49
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

29.3 p49
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
11.3 p86
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
3.8 p7
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
4.3 p12
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
10.0 p76
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1211
Value-Based Purchasing
29.3 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.7931

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.90 No Different Than the National Rate 77
Hybrid_HWM 3.40 Better Than the National Rate 1,230
MORT_30_AMI 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate 147
MORT_30_CABG 1.70 No Different Than the National Rate 96
MORT_30_COPD 7.90 No Different Than the National Rate 80
MORT_30_HF 10.10 No Different Than the National Rate 348
MORT_30_PN 14.70 No Different Than the National Rate 204
MORT_30_STK 13.60 No Different Than the National Rate 162
PSI_03 2.27 Worse Than the National Rate 5,687
PSI_04 173.53 No Different Than the National Rate 110
PSI_06 0.35 No Different Than the National Rate 6,752
PSI_08 0.39 No Different Than the National Rate 7,066
PSI_09 4.42 Worse Than the National Rate 1,826
PSI_10 1.46 No Different Than the National Rate 986
PSI_11 11.02 No Different Than the National Rate 952
PSI_12 5.59 Worse Than the National Rate 1,934
PSI_13 7.01 No Different Than the National Rate 992
PSI_14 1.82 No Different Than the National Rate 419
PSI_15 1.54 No Different Than the National Rate 1,327
PSI_90 1.75 Worse Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 71% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 78% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 67% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 26% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 67% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 9% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 75% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 19% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 74% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 19% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 69% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 23% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 53% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 28% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 67% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 15% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 38% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 41% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 14% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 86% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 14% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 86% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 14% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 86% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 56% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 18% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 26% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 1
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 43% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 22% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 35% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 14% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 27% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 59% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 9% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 59% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 32% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.600 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.390 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 22701.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 23.568 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 22.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.933 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.314 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.941 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 17448.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 23.043 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 13.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.564 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.222 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.343 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 339.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 8.251 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.606 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 1.999 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 8.172 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 221.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.859 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 8.000 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 4.303 Worse than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.478 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.579 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 192475.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 12.109 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 11.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.908 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.375 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.669 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 186581.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 90.852 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 46.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.506 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 70.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 243.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 237.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 386.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 395.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 — Emergency Department
OP_29 100.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 46.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 12.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 37.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 46.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR — Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 75.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 52.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 81.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 46.90 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 32.50 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 91.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 8.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 10.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 19.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 17.90 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
0.92

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.40 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 0.93 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.15 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $554,031,610 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $-12,673,446 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,170,741,939 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -31.9% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $1,822,356,274 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,191,277,284 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $1,228,692,279 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) -0.9% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.7% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 1425 PORTLAND AVENUE — Address
General Information City/Town ROCHESTER — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 7 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MONROE — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 330125 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NY — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (585) 922-4000 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 14621 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.61 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.45 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.97 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.98 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.06 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.79 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 0.92 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9995 p70 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.4% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 196 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 31 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 1.0000 p49 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 12.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 91 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 11 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 12.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 0.9969 p96 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.8% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 90 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 26 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 21.6% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 0.9983 p86 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.8% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 423 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 95 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.2% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 0.9916 p67 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.7% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.0% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.12 0.9955 p95 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.8% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 193 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 42 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.7% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 11.25 5.00 p86 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 10.00 2.50 p76 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 4.25 8.75 p12 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 3.75 10.00 p7 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 29.25 29.50 p49 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →