Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
2525 KINGS HIGHWAY, BROOKLYN, NY 11229
Phone
(718) 692-5302
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
1 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 6 of 7 measures reported
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 2 of 8 measures reported
2
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 6 of 11 measures reported
3
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 8 of 12 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack)
— Not reported
Heart Failure 409 discharges
1.2419 p99
Pneumonia 446 discharges
1.1519 p97
COPD 137 discharges
1.1396 p99
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
— Not reported
Expected (1.0) National median

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.2419
Value-Based Purchasing
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: 0.3480

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
Hybrid_HWM 4.80 No Different Than the National Rate 1,249
MORT_30_AMI 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate 39
MORT_30_CABG
MORT_30_COPD 6.80 No Different Than the National Rate 121
MORT_30_HF 10.70 No Different Than the National Rate 367
MORT_30_PN 16.90 No Different Than the National Rate 485
MORT_30_STK 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate 46
PSI_03 0.64 No Different Than the National Rate 5,324
PSI_04 195.85 No Different Than the National Rate 29
PSI_06 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 5,543
PSI_08 0.25 No Different Than the National Rate 5,748
PSI_09 2.05 No Different Than the National Rate 511
PSI_10
PSI_11
PSI_12 5.13 No Different Than the National Rate 493
PSI_13
PSI_14 1.71 No Different Than the National Rate 120
PSI_15 1.15 No Different Than the National Rate 916
PSI_90 1.07 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 64%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 14%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 1
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 69%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 12%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 19%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 61%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 15%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 24%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 61%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 15%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 65%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 14%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 21%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 69%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 12%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 19%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 63%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 15%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 22%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 62%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 15%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 23%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 49%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 33%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 61%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 21%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 37%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 46%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 17%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 28%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 72%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 1
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 27%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 73%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 29%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 71%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 67%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 9%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 24%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 45%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 24%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 31%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 23%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 30%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 47%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 17%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 49%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 34%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 1
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 1

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER
HAI_1_CIUPPER
HAI_1_DOPC 641.000
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 0.471
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_1_SIR
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.012 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.200 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 6192.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 4.110 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.243 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER
HAI_3_CIUPPER
HAI_3_DOPC 8.000
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 0.156
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_3_SIR
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC
HAI_4_ELIGCASES
HAI_4_NUMERATOR
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.026 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.546 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 35444.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 1.937 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.516 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.210 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.859 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 35444.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 17.689 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 8.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.452 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 178.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 174.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 193.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 3.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 49.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 78.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 55.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 92.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI Number of Cases Too Small
EDAC_30_HF 63.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 82.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.80 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_CABG
READM_30_COPD 20.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 24.30 Worse Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 18.40 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.15

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 76 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.33 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.22 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 5.04 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $44,884,708 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $4,268,630 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $118,753,280 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -25.0% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $87,759,449 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $136,238,524 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $42,874,741 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 3.5% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.5% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 2525 KINGS HIGHWAY Address
General Information City/Town BROOKLYN City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 6 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 6 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 2 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 8 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 3 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 0 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 2 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish KINGS County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 330019 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name NEW YORK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF BROOKLYN, INC. Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State NY State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (718) 692-5302 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 11229 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.19 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.85 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.62 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.35 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.15 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.14 0.9969 p99 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.2% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 137 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 40 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 21.9% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.24 0.9983 p99 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.4% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 409 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 120 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 25.3% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.15 0.9955 p97 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.3% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 446 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 99 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 20.0% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Methodology

Full methodology →