Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
11890 HEALING WAY, SILVER SPRING, MD 20904
Phone
(240) 637-4000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
2 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p7
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
6
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 267 discharges
1.0380 p73
Heart Failure 497 discharges
0.9963 p48
Pneumonia 514 discharges
1.0060 p56
COPD 149 discharges
1.0242 p72
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.0663 p70
CABG Surgery 223 discharges
1.0994 p86
Expected (1.0) National median

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0994
Value-Based Purchasing
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.2079

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.20 No Different Than the National Rate 44
Hybrid_HWM 3.60 No Different Than the National Rate 1,667
MORT_30_AMI 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate 180
MORT_30_CABG 2.80 No Different Than the National Rate 228
MORT_30_COPD 6.00 No Different Than the National Rate 130
MORT_30_HF 10.60 No Different Than the National Rate 406
MORT_30_PN 16.60 No Different Than the National Rate 521
MORT_30_STK 13.50 No Different Than the National Rate 190
PSI_03 0.94 No Different Than the National Rate 6,115
PSI_04 193.49 No Different Than the National Rate 91
PSI_06 0.14 No Different Than the National Rate 7,072
PSI_08 0.25 No Different Than the National Rate 7,604
PSI_09 2.00 No Different Than the National Rate 1,230
PSI_10 1.51 No Different Than the National Rate 490
PSI_11 6.43 No Different Than the National Rate 542
PSI_12 4.71 No Different Than the National Rate 1,402
PSI_13 6.51 No Different Than the National Rate 507
PSI_14 1.66 No Different Than the National Rate 217
PSI_15 1.13 No Different Than the National Rate 930
PSI_90 1.08 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 75%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 19%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 84%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 71%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 22%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 70%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 23%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 76%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 3
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 75%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 19%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 71%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 7%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 22%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 62%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 19%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 74%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 8%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 49%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 30%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 13%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 87%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 15%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 85%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 12%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 88%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 78%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 6%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 16%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 61%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 9%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 30%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 6%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 20%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 74%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 5%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 75%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 20%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.012 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.155 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 4606.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 4.269 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.234 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.011 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.069 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 4545.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 4.612 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.217 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.585 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 71.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 1.890 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC 48.000
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.398
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.012 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.143 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 63390.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 4.313 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.232 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.174 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.653 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 58474.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 25.292 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 9.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.356 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER 10.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 2.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 97.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 356.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 343.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 582.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 5.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 83.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 95.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 9.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 80.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 91.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 95.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 100.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 48.10 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 5.00 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 24.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 1.00 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.10 No Different Than the National Rate

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 85 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.79 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 5.37 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $7,137,365 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $239,382 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $311,540,371 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -11.8% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $456,112,707 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $283,409,378 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $448,975,342 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 0.1% metrics.total_margin
General Information Address 11890 HEALING WAY Address
General Information City/Town SILVER SPRING City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 7 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 6 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MONTGOMERY County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 210016 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name ADVENTIST HEALTHCARE WHITE OAK MEDICAL CENTER Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 2 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State MD State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (240) 637-4000 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 20904 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.44 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.57 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.11 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.61 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.20 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.21 total_hac_score
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9995 p73 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.4% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 267 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 39 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.9% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.10 1.0000 p86 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.4% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 223 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 28 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 11.4% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9969 p72 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.1% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 149 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 31 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.6% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9983 p48 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.2% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 497 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 95 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 19.2% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 0.9916 p70 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.0% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.4% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9955 p56 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.2% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 514 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 84 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.3% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Methodology

Full methodology →