Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
2501 KENTUCKY AVENUE, PADUCAH, KY 42003
Phone
(270) 575-2100
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit (Church)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
5 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p89
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 6 of 8 measures reported
1
4
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 10 of 11 measures reported
2
8
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 218 discharges
0.8127 p0
Heart Failure 437 discharges
0.9329 p12
Pneumonia 444 discharges
1.0632 p83
COPD 184 discharges
0.9720 p26
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery
0.7915 p1
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

22.4 p25
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.0 p65
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
4.2 p9
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
11.3 p67
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0632
Value-Based Purchasing
22.4 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.5755

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
Hybrid_HWM 4.60 No Different Than the National Rate 1,481
MORT_30_AMI 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate 185
MORT_30_CABG 2.20 No Different Than the National Rate 158
MORT_30_COPD 7.90 No Different Than the National Rate 173
MORT_30_HF 13.40 No Different Than the National Rate 375
MORT_30_PN 17.50 No Different Than the National Rate 410
MORT_30_STK 12.80 No Different Than the National Rate 207
PSI_03 2.40 Worse Than the National Rate 3,782
PSI_04 187.99 No Different Than the National Rate 46
PSI_06 0.21 No Different Than the National Rate 5,537
PSI_08 0.29 No Different Than the National Rate 5,655
PSI_09 1.86 No Different Than the National Rate 1,624
PSI_10 1.21 No Different Than the National Rate 849
PSI_11 7.82 No Different Than the National Rate 831
PSI_12 2.73 No Different Than the National Rate 1,669
PSI_13 4.12 No Different Than the National Rate 840
PSI_14 1.64 No Different Than the National Rate 255
PSI_15 0.89 No Different Than the National Rate 737
PSI_90 1.36 Worse Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 83%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 2%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 15%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 90%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 81%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 3%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 16%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 77%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 3%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 81%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 3%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 16%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 80%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 4%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 16%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 75%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 4%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 21%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 61%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 18%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 21%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 75%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 8%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 17%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 47%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 28%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 25%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 13%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 87%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 16%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 84%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 10%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 90%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 72%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 7%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 21%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 65%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 6%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 29%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 4
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 6%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 18%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 76%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 4%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 78%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 18%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 5
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 4

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.705 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 3.616 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 4744.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 3.451 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 6.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.739 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.345 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 2.618 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 5341.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 3.685 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 4.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 1.085 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.181 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.570 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 70.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 1.851 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.080 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC 14.000
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.119
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.170 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 3.351 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 50233.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 1.972 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 2.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.014 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.002 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.202 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 47692.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 24.445 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.041 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV medium Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 1.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 87.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 181.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 181.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 179.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 29.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 86.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 55.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 17.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 66.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 90.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 83.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 94.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -32.90 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -14.70 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 2.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 11.00 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 9.80 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.20 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 11.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 8.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 17.20 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.02

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 91 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.11 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 3.54 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 6.01 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $326,512,751 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $48,524,611 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $437,399,052 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 4.2% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $223,727,635 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $318,295,364 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-102,785,116 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 10.4% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.6% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 2501 KENTUCKY AVENUE Address
General Information City/Town PADUCAH City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 10 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 6 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 7 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 2 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 0 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MC CRACKEN County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 180104 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name BAPTIST HEALTH PADUCAH Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 5 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Church Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State KY State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (270) 575-2100 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 42003 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.63 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.10 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.38 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.85 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.67 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.58 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.02 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.81 0.9995 p0 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 11.9% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 218 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 11 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 9.7% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.79 1.0000 p1 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 9.5% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 7.5% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9969 p26 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.1% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 184 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 32 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 18.5% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 0.9983 p12 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.9% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 437 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 76 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 18.5% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9955 p83 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.7% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 444 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 78 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.6% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.00 5.00 p65 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 11.25 8.75 p67 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 4.17 10.00 p9 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 22.42 29.50 p25 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →