Hospital

UOFL HEALTH - JEWISH HOSPITAL and Mary & Elizabeth Hospital

CCN: 180040 · LOUISVILLE, KY 40202 · JEFFERSON County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
200 ABRAHAM FLEXNER WAY, LOUISVILLE, KY 40202
Phone
(502) 587-4011
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
2 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p7
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
6
1
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
6
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 11 of 12 measures reported
11 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 288 discharges
1.0378 p73
Heart Failure 552 discharges
1.1152 p96
Pneumonia 469 discharges
0.9940 p48
COPD 160 discharges
0.9817 p35
Hip/Knee Replacement
0.8334 p10
CABG Surgery 149 discharges
0.9302 p22
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

17.7 p9
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
7.1 p66
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
5.8 p17
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
4.8 p17
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1152
Value-Based Purchasing
17.7 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.6917

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate 115
Hybrid_HWM 4.00 No Different Than the National Rate 1,760
MORT_30_AMI 11.40 No Different Than the National Rate 253
MORT_30_CABG 1.90 No Different Than the National Rate 154
MORT_30_COPD 8.90 No Different Than the National Rate 149
MORT_30_HF 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate 457
MORT_30_PN 17.10 No Different Than the National Rate 455
MORT_30_STK 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate 156
PSI_03 0.41 No Different Than the National Rate 6,904
PSI_04 227.99 Worse Than the National Rate 166
PSI_06 0.33 No Different Than the National Rate 8,172
PSI_08 0.23 No Different Than the National Rate 8,926
PSI_09 2.49 No Different Than the National Rate 2,599
PSI_10 1.61 No Different Than the National Rate 1,171
PSI_11 17.65 Worse Than the National Rate 1,251
PSI_12 3.69 No Different Than the National Rate 2,656
PSI_13 7.43 No Different Than the National Rate 1,190
PSI_14 2.03 No Different Than the National Rate 478
PSI_15 1.29 No Different Than the National Rate 1,762
PSI_90 1.26 Worse Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 72% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 21% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 80% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 16% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 68% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 24% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 68% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 73% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 20% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 80% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 71% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 21% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 67% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 9% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 24% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 50% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 27% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 23% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 65% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 16% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 19% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 36% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 38% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 26% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 16% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 84% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 18% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 82% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 14% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 86% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 67% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 13% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 20% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 58% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 10% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 32% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 11% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 25% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 64% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 9% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 65% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 26% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.508 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.463 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 14338.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 15.676 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 14.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.893 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.241 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.845 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 13431.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 21.087 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 10.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.474 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.137 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.465 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 198.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 5.574 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 3.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.538 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 3.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.028 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.975 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.179 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 171138.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 16.140 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 24.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.487 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.320 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.565 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 171138.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 111.699 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 48.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.430 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 87.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 159.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 148.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 264.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 262.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 3.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 71.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 98.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 0.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 64.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 72.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 87.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 80.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 95.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 76.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 89.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 38.50 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 36.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 24.20 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 14.60 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED — Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 0.90 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 15.90 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.01

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.24 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 6.34 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 4.67 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $632,805,793 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $57,906,906 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,152,061,388 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 2.1% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $665,868,873 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $948,497,926 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $33,063,080 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 4.9% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 2.7% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 200 ABRAHAM FLEXNER WAY — Address
General Information City/Town LOUISVILLE — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 11 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 1 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 6 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish JEFFERSON — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 180040 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name UOFL HEALTH - JEWISH HOSPITAL and Mary & Elizabeth Hospital — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 2 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation — — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State KY — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (502) 587-4011 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 40202 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.44 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.58 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 1.15 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.82 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.69 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.01 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9995 p73 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.4% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 288 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 42 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.9% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 1.0000 p22 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.5% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 149 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 14 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.7% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9969 p35 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.4% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 160 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 29 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.0% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.12 0.9983 p96 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.3% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 552 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 133 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 22.6% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.83 0.9916 p10 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.3% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 4.4% — READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.99 0.9955 p48 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.2% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 469 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 80 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.1% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 7.08 5.00 p66 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 4.75 8.75 p17 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 5.83 10.00 p17 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 17.67 29.50 p9 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →