Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
1431 SW 1ST AVE, OCALA, FL 34471
Phone
(352) 401-1000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
1 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
5
2
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
4
2
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
7
2
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 9 of 12 measures reported
9 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 533 discharges
1.1634 p98
Heart Failure 1,092 discharges
1.1209 p96
Pneumonia 1,372 discharges
1.1200 p94
COPD 314 discharges
1.0138 p64
Hip/Knee Replacement 385 discharges
0.9765 p45
CABG Surgery 152 discharges
1.0548 p72
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

23.3 p28
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
4.6 p46
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
15.0 p79
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
3.8 p9
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1634
Value-Based Purchasing
23.3 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.4425

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.10 No Different Than the National Rate 436
Hybrid_HWM 5.20 Worse Than the National Rate 4,689
MORT_30_AMI 11.50 No Different Than the National Rate 531
MORT_30_CABG 2.80 No Different Than the National Rate 156
MORT_30_COPD 10.60 No Different Than the National Rate 291
MORT_30_HF 13.30 No Different Than the National Rate 912
MORT_30_PN 21.70 Worse Than the National Rate 1,329
MORT_30_STK 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate 818
PSI_03 0.41 No Different Than the National Rate 13,316
PSI_04 225.69 Worse Than the National Rate 207
PSI_06 0.18 No Different Than the National Rate 18,004
PSI_08 0.16 No Different Than the National Rate 17,587
PSI_09 1.29 No Different Than the National Rate 4,187
PSI_10 1.23 No Different Than the National Rate 1,430
PSI_11 59.92 Worse Than the National Rate 1,461
PSI_12 2.42 No Different Than the National Rate 4,128
PSI_13 4.34 No Different Than the National Rate 1,378
PSI_14 2.06 No Different Than the National Rate 753
PSI_15 1.25 No Different Than the National Rate 2,676
PSI_90 2.12 Worse Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 74%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 7%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 19%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 70%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 23%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 71%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 21%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 71%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 9%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 20%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 80%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 70%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 10%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 20%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 63%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 12%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 25%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 55%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 28%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 17%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 71%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 13%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 16%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 40%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 42%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 18%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 17%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 83%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 19%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 81%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 16%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 84%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 75%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 11%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 14%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 3
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 50%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 15%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 35%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 12%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 20%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 68%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 8%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 67%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 25%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.005 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.509 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 10522.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 9.687 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 1.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.103 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER N/A Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.205 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 12714.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 14.602 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.374 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.530 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 369.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 9.932 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 8.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.805 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC 27.000
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.228
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.032 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 0.624 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 163556.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 10.594 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 2.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.189 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.003 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.063 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 163556.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 104.908 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 2.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.019 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 28.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 114.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 112.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c Emergency Department
OP_18d 235.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 79.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 14.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 59.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 50.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 89.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 88.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 80.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 88.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 6.80 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF -1.40 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 18.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 17.00 Worse Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 1.10 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 15.50 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 11.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 4.70 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 17.90 Worse Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.03

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 97 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.44 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 3.73 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $1,127,308,434 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $222,157,539 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $817,652,329 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 25.7% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $613,246,198 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $571,823,250 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $-514,062,236 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 26.8% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 6.9% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 1431 SW 1ST AVE Address
General Information City/Town OCALA City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 9 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 5 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 2 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 2 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 4 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 2 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish MARION County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100212 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MARION COMMUNTIY HOSPITAL Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (352) 401-1000 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 34471 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.03 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.03 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.13 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.31 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.46 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.44 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.03 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.16 0.9995 p98 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 12.8% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 533 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 87 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 14.9% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.05 1.0000 p72 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.0% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 152 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 19 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 11.6% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9969 p64 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 17.6% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 314 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 57 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 17.8% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.12 0.9983 p96 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.0% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,092 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 241 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.3% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9916 p45 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.1% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of discharges 385 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Number of readmissions 19 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.0% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.12 0.9955 p94 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.6% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 1,372 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 247 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.4% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 4.58 5.00 p46 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 3.75 8.75 p9 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 15.00 10.00 p79 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 23.33 29.50 p28 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →