Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
600 E DIXIE AVE, LEESBURG, FL 34748
Phone
(352) 323-5762
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
1
6
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
8
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 367 discharges
0.9719 p30
Heart Failure 776 discharges
0.9976 p49
Pneumonia 552 discharges
1.0121 p60
COPD 219 discharges
0.9411 p7
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.1095 p78
CABG Surgery 282 discharges
0.9289 p21
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

30.3 p52
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
11.3 p86
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
7.5 p27
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
11.5 p68
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1095
Value-Based Purchasing
30.3 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.4035

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate 65
Hybrid_HWM 4.40 No Different Than the National Rate 2,274
MORT_30_AMI 13.70 No Different Than the National Rate 333
MORT_30_CABG 1.90 No Different Than the National Rate 285
MORT_30_COPD 8.40 No Different Than the National Rate 192
MORT_30_HF 8.60 Better Than the National Rate 667
MORT_30_PN 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate 545
MORT_30_STK 11.70 No Different Than the National Rate 193
PSI_03 0.13 No Different Than the National Rate 7,451
PSI_04 165.80 No Different Than the National Rate 78
PSI_06 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 8,270
PSI_08 0.30 No Different Than the National Rate 8,608
PSI_09 2.36 No Different Than the National Rate 1,901
PSI_10 2.08 No Different Than the National Rate 738
PSI_11 6.48 No Different Than the National Rate 790
PSI_12 4.08 No Different Than the National Rate 2,147
PSI_13 5.41 No Different Than the National Rate 717
PSI_14 1.59 No Different Than the National Rate 315
PSI_15 1.25 No Different Than the National Rate 1,219
PSI_90 0.84 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 78%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 17%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 3
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 76%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 19%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 74%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 20%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 69%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 8%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 23%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 77%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 18%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 66%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 8%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 26%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 63%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 10%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 27%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 63%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 20%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 17%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 3
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 76%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 9%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 15%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 49%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 31%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 20%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 12%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 88%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 4
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 14%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 86%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 10%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 90%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 75%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 7%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 18%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 4
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 55%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 10%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 35%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 10%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 21%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 69%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 3
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 7%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 67%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 26%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 3
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.379 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 2.295 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 6031.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 4.828 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.036 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.350 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 2.116 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 6006.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 5.238 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.955 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.745 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 3.371 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 171.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 4.107 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 7.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.704 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC 33.000
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.284
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.754 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 3.082 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 80656.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 4.929 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 8.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.623 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.101 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.411 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 80656.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 36.919 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 8.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.217 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 74.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 184.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 180.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 266.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d 294.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 67.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 100.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 15.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 69.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 93.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 90.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 94.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 100.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI -14.10 Fewer Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 25.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 17.90 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.50 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 0.70 Better than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 17.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 19.60 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.30 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.20 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.04

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 96 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.20 metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 1.58 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 3.58 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $97,913,226 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $5,369,331 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $277,928,075 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -3.7% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $150,275,287 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $273,589,790 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $52,362,061 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 1.8% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.0% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 600 E DIXIE AVE Address
General Information City/Town LEESBURG City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 1 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 6 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 8 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 1 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 6 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish LAKE County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100084 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name UF HEALTH LEESBURG HOSPITAL Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (352) 323-5762 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 34748 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.89 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.15 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.80 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 1.74 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 1.38 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.40 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.04 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 0.97 0.9995 p30 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.9% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 367 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 48 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.5% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.93 1.0000 p21 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.0% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 282 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 27 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.3% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 0.94 0.9969 p7 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.2% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 219 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 33 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 17.1% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9983 p49 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.3% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 776 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 157 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 20.3% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.11 0.9916 p78 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.4% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 5.9% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.01 0.9955 p60 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 16.5% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 552 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 93 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 16.7% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 11.25 5.00 p86 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 11.50 8.75 p68 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 7.50 10.00 p27 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 30.25 29.50 p52 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →