Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
2500 HARBOR BLVD, PORT CHARLOTTE, FL 33952
Phone
(941) 766-4122
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
For-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
1 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
7
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 7 of 8 measures reported
2
5
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 9 of 11 measures reported
6
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 9 of 12 measures reported
9 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 184 discharges
1.0675 p85
Heart Failure 320 discharges
1.1113 p95
Pneumonia 466 discharges
1.1120 p93
COPD 179 discharges
1.0408 p81
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery 91 discharges
1.1374 p92
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is above the national median, suggesting a positive payment adjustment.

30.4 p53
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
3.5 p36
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
20.4 p94
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
4.0 p10
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
2.5 p43
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.1374
Value-Based Purchasing
30.4 TPS
Above national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.6884

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 3.60 No Different Than the National Rate 28
Hybrid_HWM 4.90 No Different Than the National Rate 1,240
MORT_30_AMI 11.60 No Different Than the National Rate 147
MORT_30_CABG 4.20 No Different Than the National Rate 97
MORT_30_COPD 8.90 No Different Than the National Rate 161
MORT_30_HF 13.90 No Different Than the National Rate 276
MORT_30_PN 17.30 No Different Than the National Rate 439
MORT_30_STK 15.60 No Different Than the National Rate 74
PSI_03 1.30 No Different Than the National Rate 3,772
PSI_04 152.16 No Different Than the National Rate 81
PSI_06 0.15 No Different Than the National Rate 4,917
PSI_08 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate 5,170
PSI_09 2.66 No Different Than the National Rate 1,175
PSI_10 2.24 No Different Than the National Rate 452
PSI_11 10.32 No Different Than the National Rate 489
PSI_12 3.80 No Different Than the National Rate 1,270
PSI_13 5.53 No Different Than the National Rate 415
PSI_14 1.96 No Different Than the National Rate 220
PSI_15 1.02 No Different Than the National Rate 991
PSI_90 1.26 No Different Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 69%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 9%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 65%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 9%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 26%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 65%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 66%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 11%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 23%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 1
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 76%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 8%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 16%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 61%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 12%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 27%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 61%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 13%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 26%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 51%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 31%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 18%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 67%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 16%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 17%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 36%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 46%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 18%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 18%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 82%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 18%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 82%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 18%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 82%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 53%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 20%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 27%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 1
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 41%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 25%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 34%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 1
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 17%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 32%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 51%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 1
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 13%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 51%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 36%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 1

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.328 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 3132.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 2.255 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 1.001 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 4266.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 2.993 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER N/A Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 0.698 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 169.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 4.289 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER
HAI_4_CIUPPER
HAI_4_DOPC 13.000
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.120
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 0.000
HAI_4_SIR
HAI_5_CILOWER N/A No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.203 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 48811.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 2.490 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 0.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.032 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.345 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 47523.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 23.682 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 3.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.127 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV medium Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO 2.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 37.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 132.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 128.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c Emergency Department
OP_18d 270.0 Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 66.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 18.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 43.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 41.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 27.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 70.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 86.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 98.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 12.50 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 30.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 21.30 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 16.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 12.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM Number of Cases Too Small
OP_35_ED Number of Cases Too Small
OP_36 1.30 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 12.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.90 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 21.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 17.70 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.01

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 92 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.35 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 2.63 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $106,324,230 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $2,018,574 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $189,167,451 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 0.6% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $125,725,529 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $169,891,821 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $19,401,299 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 1.1% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 4.6% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 2500 HARBOR BLVD Address
General Information City/Town PORT CHARLOTTE City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 9 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 7 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 9 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 7 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 6 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 2 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 5 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish CHARLOTTE County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 100077 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name Adventhealth Port Charlotte Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Proprietary Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State FL State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (941) 766-4122 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 33952 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.17 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.20 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.69 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.01 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 0.9995 p85 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 15.1% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 184 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 33 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 16.1% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.14 1.0000 p92 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 10.3% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 91 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 14 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 11.7% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.04 0.9969 p81 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 19.3% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 179 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 39 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 20.1% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.11 0.9983 p95 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 20.6% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 320 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 81 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 22.9% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.11 0.9955 p93 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.1% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 466 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 96 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 19.0% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 3.50 5.00 p36 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 2.50 2.50 p43 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 4.00 8.75 p10 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 20.42 10.00 p94 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 30.42 29.50 p53 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →