Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
110 IRVING STREET NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20010
Phone
(202) 877-7000
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit (Other)
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
3 /5
CMS Overall Rating
p30
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
3
4
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 8 of 8 measures reported
4
4
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 11 of 11 measures reported
1
9
1
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 10 of 12 measures reported
10 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 711 discharges
1.0208 p63
Heart Failure 1,166 discharges
0.9169 p8
Pneumonia 366 discharges
0.9981 p51
COPD 156 discharges
1.0253 p73
Hip/Knee Replacement
1.0632 p69
CABG Surgery 484 discharges
0.8958 p12
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

27.3 p42
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
18.3 p98
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
6.3 p19
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
2.8 p3
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
0.0 p0
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.0632
Value-Based Purchasing
27.3 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
No Reduction
HAC Score: -0.3612

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE 4.40 No Different Than the National Rate 61
Hybrid_HWM 3.20 Better Than the National Rate 3,314
MORT_30_AMI 9.40 Better Than the National Rate 428
MORT_30_CABG 2.00 No Different Than the National Rate 495
MORT_30_COPD 6.80 No Different Than the National Rate 125
MORT_30_HF 7.50 Better Than the National Rate 839
MORT_30_PN 12.80 Better Than the National Rate 338
MORT_30_STK 12.10 No Different Than the National Rate 354
PSI_03 0.83 No Different Than the National Rate 13,288
PSI_04 177.10 No Different Than the National Rate 435
PSI_06 0.13 No Different Than the National Rate 14,298
PSI_08 0.28 No Different Than the National Rate 15,943
PSI_09 2.06 No Different Than the National Rate 5,366
PSI_10 0.68 Better Than the National Rate 2,469
PSI_11 1.94 Better Than the National Rate 2,589
PSI_12 4.18 No Different Than the National Rate 5,921
PSI_13 1.71 Better Than the National Rate 2,593
PSI_14 1.54 No Different Than the National Rate 916
PSI_15 1.29 No Different Than the National Rate 2,968
PSI_90 0.71 Better Than the National Value

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 69%
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 9%
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 22%
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating 2
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 77%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6%
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 66%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 9%
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 25%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 65%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 11%
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 24%
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 76%
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 6%
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 18%
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating 2
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4%
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 74%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 7%
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 19%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 71%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 8%
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 21%
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 53%
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 28%
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19%
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating 1
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 69%
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 13%
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 18%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 37%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 43%
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 20%
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 17%
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 83%
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating 2
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 20%
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 80%
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 15%
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 85%
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 61%
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 15%
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 24%
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 44%
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 23%
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 33%
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating 2
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 16%
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 23%
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 61%
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating 2
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 11%
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 60%
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 29%
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating 2
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating 2

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.793 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 1.489 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 33510.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 35.443 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 39.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 1.100 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.049 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.254 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 30670.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 49.154 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 6.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.122 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.304 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 1.243 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 396.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 12.224 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 8.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 0.654 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER 0.026 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CIUPPER 2.549 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_DOPC 206.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 1.935 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_SIR 0.517 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.679 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 1.545 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 241223.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 21.979 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 23.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.046 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.213 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 0.377 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 225743.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 164.156 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 47.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.286 Better than the National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV very high Emergency Department
GMCS Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 96.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 424.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 425.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 360.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d Emergency Department
OP_22 5.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 Emergency Department
OP_29 95.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 9.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 34.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 56.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 82.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 55.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 81.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 90.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 99.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 14.40 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 5.90 Average Days per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 41.60 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 14.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 14.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.90 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 5.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 1.20 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 13.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 9.40 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 18.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 18.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE 5.10 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_PN 16.20 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.02

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2024)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 95 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.94 metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 7.64 metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,024 fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $652,255,966 metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $105,624,506 metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $1,633,483,811 metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) 1.0% metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $794,429,412 metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $1,344,761,023 metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $142,173,446 metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 6.1% metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 1.9% metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 110 IRVING STREET NW Address
General Information City/Town WASHINGTON City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 11 Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 8 Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 10 Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 3 Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 4 Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 0 Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 1 Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 9 Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 1 Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 4 Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 4 Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 0 Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish THE DISTRICT County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 090011 Facility ID
General Information Facility Name MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 3 Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Other Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State DC State
General Information TE Group Footnote TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (202) 877-7000 Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 20010 ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.16 measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.20 measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 1.02 measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.72 measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.81 measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction No payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score -0.36 total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.02 Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9995 p63 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 14.9% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 711 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 109 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 15.2% READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 0.90 1.0000 p12 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.7% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 484 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 48 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 10.5% READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.03 0.9969 p73 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 21.3% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 156 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 36 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 21.8% READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 0.92 0.9983 p8 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 21.0% READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 1,166 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 218 READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 19.2% READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Excess readmission ratio 1.06 0.9916 p69 READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Expected readmission rate 5.6% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Hip/Knee Replacement — Predicted readmission rate 6.0% READM-30-HIP-KNEE-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 1.00 0.9955 p51 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 17.6% READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 366 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 64 READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 17.5% READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 18.33 5.00 p98 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 0.00 2.50 p0 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 2.75 8.75 p3 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 6.25 10.00 p19 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 27.33 29.50 p42 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →