Hospital

ST BERNARDS MEDICAL CENTER

CCN: 040020 · JONESBORO, AR 72401 · CRAIGHEAD County

Bottom quartile Middle Top quartile Percentile badges compare this hospital to all 5,426 hospitals nationally.

Overview

Address
225 E WASHINGTON AVE, JONESBORO, AR 72401
Phone
(870) 972-4100
Hospital Type
Acute Care
Ownership
Non-Profit
Emergency Services
Yes
Birthing Friendly
Yes
1 /5
★★★★★
CMS Overall Rating
p0
Acute Care — General medical and surgical hospital participating in Medicare IPPS. Subject to CMS quality reporting and payment adjustment programs (VBP, HRRP, HAC).

CMS Star Rating — Quality Domain Breakdown

CMS computes the overall star rating from five quality domains. Each domain compares this hospital's measures against national benchmarks.

Mortality 7 of 7 measures reported
5
2
Better No different Worse
30-day death rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, CABG, and kidney disease.
Safety of Care 6 of 8 measures reported
3
2
1
Better No different Worse
Healthcare-associated infections and patient safety indicators (PSI-90 composite).
Readmission 10 of 11 measures reported
7
3
Better No different Worse
30-day unplanned readmission rates for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, hip/knee replacement, and CABG.
Patient Experience 8 of 8 measures reported
8 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
HCAHPS survey scores — patient-reported experience with communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, and discharge planning.
Timely & Effective Care 12 of 12 measures reported
12 measures reported (comparative data not available for this domain)
Process-of-care measures including flu immunization, blood clot prevention, and appropriate use of imaging.

Readmissions — Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

The Excess Readmission Ratio (ERR) compares this hospital's 30-day readmission rate to expected, adjusting for patient mix. An ERR of 1.0 means readmissions are as expected; > 1.0 triggers a Medicare payment penalty (up to 3%).

⚠ This hospital has excess readmissions in at least one condition and is subject to HRRP payment reduction.
Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) 246 discharges
1.0224 p63
Heart Failure 399 discharges
1.0926 p91
Pneumonia 415 discharges
0.9834 p41
COPD 413 discharges
1.0715 p93
Hip/Knee Replacement
— Not reported
CABG Surgery 118 discharges
1.2153 p97
Expected (1.0) National median

Value-Based Purchasing

The Hospital VBP Program adjusts Medicare payments based on clinical quality. The Total Performance Score (TPS) is a weighted composite of four domains, each worth 25%. This hospital's TPS is below the national median, suggesting a negative payment adjustment.

26.8 p40
Total Performance Score
National median: 29.5
Clinical Outcomes 25% weight
1.0 p14
Nat'l median: 5.0
Measures mortality rates for conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and COPD. Based on 30-day risk-standardized mortality.
Safety 25% weight
10.8 p53
Nat'l median: 10.0
Patient safety measures including healthcare-associated infections (CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, MRSA, C. diff) and perioperative complications.
Person & Community Engagement 25% weight
12.5 p74
Nat'l median: 8.8
Based on HCAHPS patient experience survey results — communication with nurses and doctors, hospital cleanliness, pain management, discharge information.
Efficiency & Cost Reduction 25% weight
2.5 p43
Nat'l median: 2.5
Based on Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). Measures episode-of-care costs from 3 days before admission through 30 days after discharge.

CMS Payment Programs

Three Medicare programs adjust hospital payments based on quality performance. Hospitals can be penalized under multiple programs simultaneously.

Readmissions (HRRP)
Penalized
Worst ERR: 1.2153
Value-Based Purchasing
26.8 TPS
Below national median
HAC Reduction
Payment Reduced
HAC Score: 0.4531

Complications & Deaths

30-day mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and complication rates. "Better" means statistically significantly better than the national rate.

Measure Score vs. National Denominator
COMP_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small —
Hybrid_HWM 5.00 No Different Than the National Rate 2,070
MORT_30_AMI 14.20 No Different Than the National Rate 225
MORT_30_CABG 4.90 Worse Than the National Rate 123
MORT_30_COPD 11.70 Worse Than the National Rate 356
MORT_30_HF 12.60 No Different Than the National Rate 329
MORT_30_PN 20.70 Worse Than the National Rate 379
MORT_30_STK 16.60 No Different Than the National Rate 258
PSI_03 8.19 Worse Than the National Rate 6,868
PSI_04 171.11 No Different Than the National Rate 116
PSI_06 0.22 No Different Than the National Rate 8,897
PSI_08 0.38 No Different Than the National Rate 9,336
PSI_09 2.12 No Different Than the National Rate 2,005
PSI_10 1.50 No Different Than the National Rate 690
PSI_11 8.60 No Different Than the National Rate 702
PSI_12 3.72 No Different Than the National Rate 1,993
PSI_13 4.89 No Different Than the National Rate 684
PSI_14 1.61 No Different Than the National Rate 346
PSI_15 0.95 No Different Than the National Rate 1,600
PSI_90 3.16 Worse Than the National Value —

Patient Experience (HCAHPS)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems — standardized patient survey measuring satisfaction with care.

Measure Score Star Rating
H_COMP_1_A_P: Nurses "always" communicated well 81% —
H_COMP_1_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 5% —
H_COMP_1_U_P: Nurses "usually" communicated well 14% —
H_COMP_1_LINEAR_SCORE: Nurse communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_1_STAR_RATING: Nurse communication - star rating — 4
H_NURSE_RESPECT_A_P: Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3% —
H_NURSE_RESPECT_U_P: Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_A_P: Nurses "always" listened carefully 79% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 5% —
H_NURSE_LISTEN_U_P: Nurses "usually" listened carefully 16% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_A_P: Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand 77% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 6% —
H_NURSE_EXPLAIN_U_P: Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand 17% —
H_COMP_2_A_P: Doctors "always" communicated well 81% —
H_COMP_2_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well 4% —
H_COMP_2_U_P: Doctors "usually" communicated well 15% —
H_COMP_2_LINEAR_SCORE: Doctor communication - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_2_STAR_RATING: Doctor communication - star rating — 4
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_A_P: Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect 89% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2% —
H_DOCTOR_RESPECT_U_P: Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_A_P: Doctors "always" listened carefully 80% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully 6% —
H_DOCTOR_LISTEN_U_P: Doctors "usually" listened carefully 14% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_A_P: Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand 75% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_SN_P: Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand 5% —
H_DOCTOR_EXPLAIN_U_P: Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand 20% —
H_COMP_5_A_P: Staff "always" explained 60% —
H_COMP_5_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained 21% —
H_COMP_5_U_P: Staff "usually" explained 19% —
H_COMP_5_LINEAR_SCORE: Communication about medicines - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_5_STAR_RATING: Communication about medicines - star rating — 2
H_MED_FOR_A_P: Staff "always" explained new medications 74% —
H_MED_FOR_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications 10% —
H_MED_FOR_U_P: Staff "usually" explained new medications 16% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_A_P: Staff "always" explained possible side effects 47% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_SN_P: Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects 32% —
H_SIDE_EFFECTS_U_P: Staff "usually" explained possible side effects 21% —
H_COMP_6_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients this information 14% —
H_COMP_6_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients this information 86% —
H_COMP_6_LINEAR_SCORE: Discharge information - linear mean score — —
H_COMP_6_STAR_RATING: Discharge information - star rating — 3
H_DISCH_HELP_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge 17% —
H_DISCH_HELP_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge 83% —
H_SYMPTOMS_N_P: No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms 11% —
H_SYMPTOMS_Y_P: Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms 89% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_A_P: Room was "always" clean 64% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_SN_P: Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean 16% —
H_CLEAN_HSP_U_P: Room was "usually" clean 20% —
H_CLEAN_LINEAR_SCORE: Cleanliness - linear mean score — —
H_CLEAN_STAR_RATING: Cleanliness - star rating — 2
H_QUIET_HSP_A_P: "Always" quiet at night 61% —
H_QUIET_HSP_SN_P: "Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night 10% —
H_QUIET_HSP_U_P: "Usually" quiet at night 29% —
H_QUIET_LINEAR_SCORE: Quietness - linear mean score — —
H_QUIET_STAR_RATING: Quietness - star rating — 3
H_HSP_RATING_0_6: Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low) 6% —
H_HSP_RATING_7_8: Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium) 22% —
H_HSP_RATING_9_10: Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high) 72% —
H_HSP_RATING_LINEAR_SCORE: Overall hospital rating - linear mean score — —
H_HSP_RATING_STAR_RATING: Overall hospital rating - star rating — 4
H_RECMND_DN: "NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it) 3% —
H_RECMND_DY: "YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital 74% —
H_RECMND_PY: "YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital 23% —
H_RECMND_LINEAR_SCORE: Recommend hospital - linear mean score — —
H_RECMND_STAR_RATING: Recommend hospital - star rating — 4
H_STAR_RATING: Summary star rating — 3

Healthcare Associated Infections

Standardized Infection Ratios (SIR). A SIR < 1.0 means fewer infections than predicted based on national baseline data.

Measure Score (SIR) vs. National
HAI_1_CILOWER 0.180 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_CIUPPER 0.813 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_DOPC 16245.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_ELIGCASES 17.033 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_NUMERATOR 7.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_1_SIR 0.411 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CILOWER 0.205 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_CIUPPER 0.837 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_DOPC 14540.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_ELIGCASES 18.159 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_NUMERATOR 8.000 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_2_SIR 0.441 Better than the National Benchmark
HAI_3_CILOWER 0.384 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_CIUPPER 2.320 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_DOPC 184.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_ELIGCASES 4.776 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_NUMERATOR 5.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_3_SIR 1.047 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_4_CILOWER — —
HAI_4_CIUPPER — —
HAI_4_DOPC 49.000 —
HAI_4_ELIGCASES 0.459 —
HAI_4_NUMERATOR 1.000 —
HAI_4_SIR — —
HAI_5_CILOWER 0.579 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_CIUPPER 2.033 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_DOPC 104643.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_ELIGCASES 8.768 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_NUMERATOR 10.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_5_SIR 1.141 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CILOWER 0.647 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_CIUPPER 1.088 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_DOPC 100793.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_ELIGCASES 67.366 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_NUMERATOR 57.000 No Different than National Benchmark
HAI_6_SIR 0.846 No Different than National Benchmark

Timely & Effective Care

Process-of-care measures including ED wait times, treatment timeliness, and preventive care.

Measure Score Condition
EDV high Emergency Department
GMCS — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Diagnosis_Documented — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Malnutrition_Screening — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutrition_Assessment — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
GMCS_Nutritional_Care_Plan — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPER — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_HYPO — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
HH_ORAE — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
IMM_3 95.0 Healthcare Personnel Vaccination
OP_18a 224.0 Emergency Department
OP_18b 224.0 Emergency Department
OP_18c 244.0 Emergency Department
OP_18d — Emergency Department
OP_22 1.0 Emergency Department
OP_23 100.0 Emergency Department
OP_29 99.0 Colonoscopy care
OP_31 — Cataract surgery outcome
OP_40 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SAFE_USE_OF_OPIOIDS 18.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
SEP_1 86.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_3HR 100.0 Sepsis Care
SEP_SH_6HR 98.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_3HR 89.0 Sepsis Care
SEV_SEP_6HR 95.0 Sepsis Care
STK_02 97.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_03 78.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
STK_05 86.0 Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_1 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure
VTE_2 — Electronic Clinical Quality Measure

Unplanned Hospital Visits

Readmission and ED return rates within 30 days of discharge.

Measure Score vs. National
EDAC_30_AMI 19.70 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_HF 32.00 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
EDAC_30_PN 22.80 More Days Than Average per 100 Discharges
Hybrid_HWR 15.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_32 13.10 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ADM 10.40 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_35_ED 4.70 No Different Than the National Rate
OP_36 0.80 No Different than expected
READM_30_AMI 14.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_CABG 12.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_COPD 19.80 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HF 22.00 No Different Than the National Rate
READM_30_HIP_KNEE — Number of Cases Too Small
READM_30_PN 16.10 No Different Than the National Rate

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary

MSPB ratio: values > 1.0 mean this hospital's episode spending is higher than the national median hospital.

Value
1.06

Financial Health (Cost Report — FY 2023)

All Data

Every labeled metric surfaced for this hospital, with national medians and percentiles where a benchmark is available.

Download CSV

Show 94 rows
Source Metric Value National Median Pctl. Raw key
Cost Report Cost-to-Charge Ratio 0.32 — metrics.cost_to_charge_ratio
Cost Report Current Ratio 2.85 — metrics.current_ratio
Cost Report Employees per Bed 6.76 — metrics.employees_per_bed
Cost Report fiscal_year 2,023 — fiscal_year
Cost Report Fund Balance ($) $210,736,295 — metrics.fund_balance
Cost Report Net Income ($) $23,270,256 — metrics.net_income
Cost Report Net Patient Revenue ($) $458,763,603 — metrics.net_patient_revenue
Cost Report Occupancy Rate (%) 3.6% — metrics.occupancy_rate
Cost Report Operating Margin (%) -17.4% — metrics.operating_margin
Cost Report Total Assets ($) $337,736,182 — metrics.total_assets
Cost Report Total Costs ($) $426,019,923 — metrics.total_costs
Cost Report Total Liabilities ($) $126,999,887 — metrics.total_liabilities
Cost Report Total Margin (%) 4.1% — metrics.total_margin
Cost Report Uncompensated Care (%) 5.5% — metrics.uncompensated_care_pct
General Information Address 225 E WASHINGTON AVE — Address
General Information City/Town JONESBORO — City/Town
General Information Count of Facility MORT Measures 7 — Count of Facility MORT Measures
General Information Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures 8 — Count of Facility Pt Exp Measures
General Information Count of Facility READM Measures 10 — Count of Facility READM Measures
General Information Count of Facility Safety Measures 6 — Count of Facility Safety Measures
General Information Count of Facility TE Measures 12 — Count of Facility TE Measures
General Information Count of MORT Measures Better 0 — Count of MORT Measures Better
General Information Count of MORT Measures No Different 5 — Count of MORT Measures No Different
General Information Count of MORT Measures Worse 2 — Count of MORT Measures Worse
General Information Count of READM Measures Better 0 — Count of READM Measures Better
General Information Count of READM Measures No Different 7 — Count of READM Measures No Different
General Information Count of READM Measures Worse 3 — Count of READM Measures Worse
General Information Count of Safety Measures Better 3 — Count of Safety Measures Better
General Information Count of Safety Measures No Different 2 — Count of Safety Measures No Different
General Information Count of Safety Measures Worse 1 — Count of Safety Measures Worse
General Information County/Parish CRAIGHEAD — County/Parish
General Information Emergency Services Yes — Emergency Services
General Information Facility ID 040020 — Facility ID
General Information Facility Name ST BERNARDS MEDICAL CENTER — Facility Name
General Information Hospital overall rating 1 — Hospital overall rating
General Information Hospital overall rating footnote — — Hospital overall rating footnote
General Information Hospital Ownership Voluntary non-profit - Private — Hospital Ownership
General Information Hospital Type Acute Care Hospitals — Hospital Type
General Information Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation Y — Meets criteria for birthing friendly designation
General Information MORT Group Footnote — — MORT Group Footnote
General Information MORT Group Measure Count 7 — MORT Group Measure Count
General Information Pt Exp Group Footnote — — Pt Exp Group Footnote
General Information Pt Exp Group Measure Count 8 — Pt Exp Group Measure Count
General Information READM Group Footnote — — READM Group Footnote
General Information READM Group Measure Count 11 — READM Group Measure Count
General Information Safety Group Footnote — — Safety Group Footnote
General Information Safety Group Measure Count 8 — Safety Group Measure Count
General Information State AR — State
General Information TE Group Footnote — — TE Group Footnote
General Information TE Group Measure Count 12 — TE Group Measure Count
General Information Telephone Number (870) 972-4100 — Telephone Number
General Information ZIP Code 72401 — ZIP Code
HAC Reduction Program fiscal_year 2,026 — fiscal_year
HAC Reduction Program measures — cauti — sir 0.39 — measures.cauti.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — cdi — sir 0.69 — measures.cdi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — clabsi — sir 0.39 — measures.clabsi.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — mrsa — sir 0.67 — measures.mrsa.sir
HAC Reduction Program measures — ssi — sir 0.82 — measures.ssi.sir
HAC Reduction Program payment_reduction Yes — payment_reduction
HAC Reduction Program total_hac_score 0.45 — total_hac_score
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary End Date 12/31/2024 — End Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Measure ID MSPB-1 — Measure ID
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Start Date 01/01/2024 — Start Date
Medicare Spending per Beneficiary Value 1.06 — Value
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Excess readmission ratio 1.02 0.9995 p63 READM-30-AMI-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Expected readmission rate 13.5% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of discharges 246 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Number of readmissions 35 — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) — Predicted readmission rate 13.8% — READM-30-AMI-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Excess readmission ratio 1.22 1.0000 p97 READM-30-CABG-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Expected readmission rate 11.1% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of discharges 118 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Number of readmissions 21 — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) CABG Surgery — Predicted readmission rate 13.4% — READM-30-CABG-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Excess readmission ratio 1.07 0.9969 p93 READM-30-COPD-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Expected readmission rate 18.0% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of discharges 413 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Number of readmissions 85 — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) COPD — Predicted readmission rate 19.3% — READM-30-COPD-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Excess readmission ratio 1.09 0.9983 p91 READM-30-HF-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Expected readmission rate 19.4% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of discharges 399 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Number of readmissions 91 — READM-30-HF-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Heart Failure — Predicted readmission rate 21.2% — READM-30-HF-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Excess readmission ratio 0.98 0.9955 p41 READM-30-PN-HRRP.excess_readmission_ratio
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Expected readmission rate 15.7% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.expected_readmission_rate
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of discharges 415 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_discharges
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Number of readmissions 63 — READM-30-PN-HRRP.num_readmissions
Readmissions (HRRP) Pneumonia — Predicted readmission rate 15.4% — READM-30-PN-HRRP.predicted_readmission_rate
Value-Based Purchasing Clinical Outcomes 1.00 5.00 p14 clinical_outcomes_score
Value-Based Purchasing Efficiency & Cost Reduction 2.50 2.50 p43 efficiency_score
Value-Based Purchasing Person & Community Engagement 12.50 8.75 p74 person_community_score
Value-Based Purchasing Safety 10.83 10.00 p53 safety_score
Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score 26.83 29.50 p40 total_performance_score
Methodology

Full methodology →